GOAL ACHIEVEMENT, PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND THE SUCCESS OF MEDIATION

Abstract

This research examined the relationships among a number of outcomes of mediation. The sample consisted of 73 hearings at two dispute settlement centers in New York State. Predictions from goal achievement theory were contrasted with predictions from procedural justice theory. In accordance with goal achievement theory, disputants who attained their goals in the agreement indicated immediate satisfaction with that agreement and with the conduct of the hearing. However, goal achievement was unrelated to long‐run success or long‐run satisfaction with the agreement, a result which may apply primarily to the mediation of interpersonal disputes. The predictions from procedural justice theory were more successful. Disputants who perceived that the underlying problems had been aired, that the mediator had understood what they said and that they had received a fair hearing also showed immediate satisfaction with the agreement and with the conduct of the hearing. In addition, these and related perceptions—especially in the eyes of the respondent—were predictive of several aspects of long‐run success.

Citation

Pruitt, D.G., Peirce, R.S., Zubek, J.M., Welton, G.L. and Nochajski, T.H. (1990), "GOAL ACHIEVEMENT, PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND THE SUCCESS OF MEDIATION", International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022671