To read this content please select one of the options below:

THE IMPORTANCE OF CHOICE OF LAW AND FINALITY TO PvP, NETTING AND COLLATERAL ARRANGEMENTS

RANDALL GUYNN (PARTNER OF DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL SINCE 1993.)
MARGARET TAHYAR (ASSOCIATED WITH DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL SINCE 1989)

Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance

ISSN: 1358-1988

Article publication date: 1 February 1996

91

Abstract

The authors argue that two of the significant legal issues that must be solved if cross‐border payment versus payment, netting and collateral arrangements are to achieve their full potential involve choice of law and finality. First, the parties must be able to determine, in advance, what law will govern and, second, each payment, netting event or security interest must achieve a sufficient degree of finality under applicable law.

Citation

GUYNN, R. and TAHYAR, M. (1996), "THE IMPORTANCE OF CHOICE OF LAW AND FINALITY TO PvP, NETTING AND COLLATERAL ARRANGEMENTS", Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 170-177. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb024879

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1996, MCB UP Limited

Related articles