To read this content please select one of the options below:

R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions ex parte Holding and Barnes plc and others

Joanna Gray (Solicitor, School of Law, University of Northumbria, Newcastle upon Tyne)

Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance

ISSN: 1358-1988

Article publication date: 1 March 2001

115

Abstract

Although the facts giving rise to this decision concerned planning control and planning law the decision is of relevance to the debate about the applicability of the Human Rights Act 1998 to the various regulatory functions and powers conferred on the Financial Services Authority (FSA) by the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, hence its inclusion and discussion in this Journal. The three conjoined appeals which formed the subject matter of this decision were made directly to the House of Lords from a decision of the Divisional Court on 13th December, 2000 whereby the court made a declaration of incompatibility with Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in respect of certain statutory decision‐making powers conferred on the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (the Secretary of State).

Citation

LJ, S., LJ, N., LJ, H., LJ, H., LJ, C. and Gray, J. (2001), "R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions ex parte Holding and Barnes plc and others", Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 275-278. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025081

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2001, MCB UP Limited

Related articles