To read this content please select one of the options below:

The Right to Silence, Section 2 and Recent Case Law

Journal of Financial Crime

ISSN: 1359-0790

Article publication date: 1 March 1995

130

Abstract

Serious fraud trials are the sum of their component parts such that examination of one particular area often repays attention. The Roskill Fraud Trials Committee's criticisms were the backdrop for the Criminal Justice Act 1987 and the enhanced investigatory powers that are to be found in s. 2 thereof. Seven years after the enactment of the 1987 Act it is apposite to examine whether in derogating from the confines of traditional criminal evidential practices a certain level of procedural and substantive fairness has been maintained. The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) and its application to the rights of a suspect are also of importance. A critical examination of the above issues demands steering a careful course between prescriptive rules and theory: in this area above all others it is impossible and undesirable to divorce one from the other.

Citation

Savla, S. (1995), "The Right to Silence, Section 2 and Recent Case Law", Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 176-185. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025704

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1995, MCB UP Limited

Related articles