United States of America - As The United States argues over health care, nations embrace global coverage

Citation

(2012), "United States of America - As The United States argues over health care, nations embrace global coverage", International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 25 No. 7. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhcqa.2012.06225gaa.005

United States of America - As The United States argues over health care, nations embrace global coverage

Article Type: News and views From: International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Volume 25, Issue 7

Keywords: American Health-Care Law, Global healthcare strategy, Medical insurance coverage, Healthcare improvement policies

Even as Americans debate whether President Obama’s health-care law and its promise of guaranteed health coverage should be scrapped, many far less affluent nations are moving in the opposite direction to provide medical insurance to all citizens.

China, after years of underfunding health care, is on track to complete a three-year, $124 billion initiative projected to cover more than 90 per cent of its population.

Mexico, which a decade ago covered less than half its population, just completed an eight-year drive for universal coverage that has dramatically expanded Mexicans’ access to lifesaving treatments for diseases such as leukemia and breast cancer.

In Thailand, where the gross domestic product per person is one-fifth of America’s, just 1 per cent of the population lacks health insurance. And in sub-Saharan Africa, Rwanda and Ghana – two of the world’s poorest nations – are working to create networks of insurance plans to cover their citizens.

“This is truly a global movement,” said Dr Julio Frenk, a former health minister in Mexico and dean of the Harvard School of Public Health. “As countries advance, they are realizing that creating universal health-care systems is a necessity for long-term economic development.”

Many countries are still struggling to improve the quality of their medical care. And making health care affordable remains a challenge for most countries, as it does for the USA, where about 15 per cent of the population lacks coverage.

Today, the USA is alone among the world’s richest nations in not providing health-care coverage to all citizens.

Although the new US health law is to do that in 2014, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, has promised to repeal it. Romney’s alternative does not include any provision to guarantee coverage.

The Supreme Court is expected to hand down a ruling on a legal challenge to the health-care law in June.

Two decades ago, many former communist countries in Eastern Europe and elsewhere dismantled their universal health-care systems amid a drive to set up free-market economies.

But popular demand has fueled an effort in nearly all of these countries to rebuild their systems. Similar pressure exists in fast-growing nations in Asia and Latin America, where rising living standards have raised expectations for better services.

Some countries have set up public systems like those in Great Britain or Canada. But many others are relying on a mix of government and commercial insurance, as in the USA.

In countries such as India, politicians have learned that one of the surest ways to secure votes is to promise better access to health care.

The Thai system, set up a decade ago, has survived years of political upheaval and a military coup. “No party dares touch it,” said Dr Suit Wibulpolprasert, a senior adviser to the Ministry of Public Health.

Many political leaders around the world also have concluded that creating a system of universal health care is crucial to remaining competitive and sustaining economic growth.

Chinese leaders were concerned their citizens were saving excessively because there was no system to protect them if they got seriously ill, said Yanzhong Huang, director of the Center for Global Health Studies at Seton Hall University.

The high savings rate was restraining domestic demand for consumer items, making the economy overly dependent on selling goods abroad.

In Mexico, political leaders were alarmed to see that poor families were often forced to pull a child out of school or to give up productive assets such as livestock or equipment to pay medical bills, said Frenk, the former health minister.

Before embarking on its health-care push, the Mexican government found that 4 million people every year were being driven into bankruptcy by illness. “That was a huge drag on the economy,” Frenk said.

Today, Mexico’s new government insurance plan – known as Seguro Popular – covers more than 50 million people, filling the gap left by the traditional health-insurance system funded by payroll taxes.

Such steps do not eliminate all financial strain on households. Indeed, in many poor nations that are expanding health-care coverage, such as Vietnam and the Philippines, people still must pay most of their own medical bills, a sign of skimpy coverage.

Governments, too, feel the strain. Colombia’s universal health-care system, set up in 1993, has cost more than twice what was expected, said Ramiro Guerrero, a former vice minister of health.

And while the impact of broader coverage on overall health is still unclear, there are some signs that citizens of countries committed to guaranteeing health coverage are getting more treatment for serious illnesses.

In Mexico, the 30-month survival rate for children with cancer has more than doubled since the creation of the Seguro Popular program in 2003. In Ghana, visits to clinics and hospitals have doubled since the West African country passed a universal health law in 2003, said Nathaniel Otoo, general counsel for the National Health Insurance Authority of Ghana.

The universal system has also become a foundation for improving the quality of medical care in many countries such as China, where the government is now pushing a major overhaul in the way physicians are trained.

“That is the next challenge,” said Dr. Jeanette Vega, a former vice minister of health in Chile who is now managing director of the New York-based Rockefeller Foundation.

For more information: www.healthleadersmedia.com