Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest
Bannner:Try our mobile site beta
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Library Review

Library Review

ISSN: 0024-2535

Online from: 1927

Subject Area: Library and Information Studies

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals


Document Information:
Title:Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals
Author(s):R. John Robertson, (Centre for Digital Library Research, Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK)
Citation:R. John Robertson, (2005) "Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals", Library Review, Vol. 54 Iss: 5, pp.295 - 300
Keywords:Digital libraries, Information science, Librarians, Professions
Article type:Viewpoint
DOI:10.1108/00242530510600543 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

Purpose – In contrast with recent studies noting the necessity of library and information science (LIS) skills in digital library and repository projects, this study aims to examine the impact of metadata quality requirements on how LIS professionals apply their skills outside a library setting.

Design/methodology/approach – The paper reviews the concept of metadata quality and examines the implications of this for LIS professionals by reviewing the differences between the context of the library community and other relevant communities of practice.

Findings – The paper argues that, although much needed, LIS skills require contextualisation before application outside library settings.

Research limitations/implications – Many of the new opportunities for and settings of LIS skills are immature – consequently this analysis may date as the context of these settings mature. Current trends, however, suggest that it will not.

Practical implications – Training in LIS skills should take account of how they might apply differently outside libraries. Librarians co-operating with colleagues outside the library should appreciate the potential metadata “compromises” they might have to make and why they are necessary.

Originality/value – The paper provides food for thought on the increasing number of LIS professionals working outside library settings.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (54kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Order

Fill in an Order form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright info  |  Site Policies
..