Search
  Advanced Search
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Women In Management Review

Women In Management Review

ISSN: 0964-9425
Currently published as: Gender in Management: An International Journal

Online from: 1985

Subject Area: Human Resource Management

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Does size matter? Gender-based equal opportunity in UK small and medium enterprises


Document Information:
Title:Does size matter? Gender-based equal opportunity in UK small and medium enterprises
Author(s):Carol Woodhams, (Human Resource and Organisational Behaviour Group, Manchester Metropolitan University Business School, Manchester, UK), Ben Lupton, (Human Resource and Organisational Behaviour Group, Manchester Metropolitan University Business School, Manchester, UK)
Citation:Carol Woodhams, Ben Lupton, (2006) "Does size matter? Gender-based equal opportunity in UK small and medium enterprises", Women In Management Review, Vol. 21 Iss: 2, pp.143 - 169
Keywords:Equal opportunities, Gender, Small to medium-sized enterprises, United Kingdom
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/09649420610650710 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the take up of gender-based equal opportunities policies and practices in small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and explores the relationship between size and take up within the SME sector.

Design/methodology/approach – The paper draws on detailed data generated by a European Social Fund sponsored equality audit tool (breakthrough). This is an interactive, questionnaire-based programme incorporating 60 questions on human resources policies and practices relevant to gender-based equal opportunity. The questionnaire was administered within a structured interview, which was recorded and transcribed. In the North West of England, 80 SMEs, across a range of sectors, participated.

Findings – The data revealed that, while there was some evidence of take up of good equality practice in SMEs, many small businesses were not active in this area and indeed a sizeable minority were perpetuating discriminatory practices. Medium-sized organisations were more likely to have, and implement, equality policies than small ones. However, in one area, around flexibility to meet carer responsibilities, the small organisations performed better. Analysis of moderating variables suggests that it is factors related to size, rather than size per se, that explain the differences in take up between small- and medium-sized firms.

Originality/value – The paper highlights the need to find ways to engage SME managers with the equality agenda. It explores the distinctive features of the small firms and their environment which may inhibit this at present and set out an agenda for future research which will deepen understanding in this area and inform policy.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?
- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (131kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list


Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions