Online from: 1986
Subject Area: Human Resource Management
|Title:||The importance of self- and shared leadership in team based knowledge work: A meso-level model of leadership dynamics|
|Author(s):||Michelle C. Bligh, (School of Behavioral and Organizational Sciences, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, California, USA), Craig L. Pearce, (Peter F. Drucker and Masatoshi Ito Graduate School of Management, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, California, USA), Jeffrey C. Kohles, (College of Business Administration, California State University San Marcos, San Marcos, California, USA)|
|Citation:||Michelle C. Bligh, Craig L. Pearce, Jeffrey C. Kohles, (2006) "The importance of self- and shared leadership in team based knowledge work: A meso-level model of leadership dynamics", Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 21 Iss: 4, pp.296 - 318|
|Keywords:||Knowledge organizations, Leadership, Shared leadership, Team working, Trust|
|Article type:||Research paper|
|DOI:||10.1108/02683940610663105 (Permanent URL)|
|Publisher:||Emerald Group Publishing Limited|
Purpose – To address the increasing need for novel approaches to leadership that deal with the challenges organizations face as they flatten, diversify, and confront increasingly complex problems.
Design/methodology/approach – A meso-level theoretical model is developed that outlines the relationship between self- and shared leadership, focusing on the intermediary processes of trust, potency, and commitment that may lead to the development of shared leadership and ultimately more innovative knowledge creation.
Findings – Nine propositions are developed, addressing the relationships between self- and shared leadership, concluding with some of the theoretical and practical implications of the model and specific recommendations for future empirical work in this area.
Research limitations/implications – An important boundary condition of the model is that it assumes team and organizational incentives are in place to encourage team building and the facilitation of team over individual achievements.
Practical implications – Conceptualizing leadership in this way leads to numerous unanswered questions regarding how team dynamics influence, and are influenced by, various forms of leadership (including lateral, upward, and downward influence attempts). Greater dialogue between the team dynamics literature and the leadership literature may lead to new insights into how shared leadership is influenced by a variety of team characteristics, including team ability, size, member maturity, familiarity, likeability, cohesion, etc., all of which are potential areas for future research.
Originality/value – Important research questions that stem from consideration of these two theories in concert will prove critical in understanding the complex interrelationships among self-leadership, shared leadership, and the creation of new knowledge in today's complex and dynamic organizations.
Existing customers: login
to access this document
Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (165kb)
Due to our platform migration, pay-per-view is temporarily unavailable.
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian