ISSN: 0332-1649
Online from: 1982
Subject Area: Electrical & Electronic Engineering
Content: Latest Issue |
Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues
Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile
| Title: | Evaluation of UPFC and ASVC applied to nonlinear load model |
|---|---|
| Author(s): | M.R. Qader, (Department of Electrical and Electronics, College of Engineering, University of Bahrain, Isa Town, Kingdom of Bahrain) |
| Citation: | M.R. Qader, (2006) "Evaluation of UPFC and ASVC applied to nonlinear load model", COMPEL: The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Vol. 25 Iss: 4, pp.1019 - 1030 |
| Keywords: | Flow, Numerical analysis, Optimization techniques, Power transmission systems, Voltage fluctuations |
| Article type: | General review |
| DOI: | 10.1108/03321640610684141 (Permanent URL) |
| Publisher: | Emerald Group Publishing Limited |
| Abstract: | Purpose – Unified power flow controller (UPFC) and advanced static VAR compensator (ASVC) devices are now recognized as the most important flexible AC transmission systems (FACTS) devices. This paper aims to focus on this. Design/methodology/approach – The effects of the location of such installation FACTS devices are examined. Findings – The UPFC as a voltage regulator and ASVC devices applied to a non-linear load are modeled and analyzed. It was found that the optimum installation position for a UPFC device is at the sending end bus where wide range of receiver terminal line voltage and active power can be controlled. However, it was also found that the optimum installation position for an ASVC device is at the receiving end bus where a wide range of receiver terminal line voltage and active power can be controlled. In both cases, it was found that a wider range of reactive power could be controlled when the devices are installed closer to the receiving end bus. Originality/value – Shows that the mid-point of a transmission line is the optimal location for some FACTS devices or reactive power support. The proof is based on a fixed receiving end voltage magnitude, which is practically not valid. |
Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (354kb)
To purchase this item please login or register.
Fill in an Order form to request this document from your librarian