Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest
Bannner:Try our mobile site beta
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

ISSN: 0969-9988

Online from: 1994

Subject Area: Built Environment

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Icon: .Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Exploring change in construction: supply chain management


Document Information:
Title:Exploring change in construction: supply chain management
Author(s):Scott Fernie, (School of the Built Environment, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK), Anthony Thorpe, (Department of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK)
Citation:Scott Fernie, Anthony Thorpe, (2007) "Exploring change in construction: supply chain management", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 14 Iss: 4, pp.319 - 333
Keywords:Change management, Construction industry, Supply chain management, United Kingdom
Article type:Case study
DOI:10.1108/09699980710760649 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to explore the process of change within organisations in the construction sector related to the content of change called for by reformers such as Egan, Latham, Constructing Excellence and the “rethinking construction” movement. The concept of supply chain management is used within the research to facilitate this kind of exploration.

Design/methodology/approach – The broad framework adopted in the paper is contextual in nature and informed by structuration theory and new institutionalism. The approach followed is a case study method that looks for literal replication across a number of cases.

Findings – Supply chain management is found to be both synonymous with the concept of partnering and particularly problematic for organisations to implement within the construction sector due to specific contextual factors.

Research limitations/implications – All methodological positions have limitations. Like all research this piece of work is the product of choices that could have been different and achieved different outcomes.

Originality/value – The findings support a view that contextual approaches provide greater insight into the problematic nature of change in the construction sector and concerns regarding the development of a robust, relevant and sustainable agenda for change within the sector.



Icon: Access.Document Options:

Content access

References

Further reading

Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright info  |  Site Policies
..