Online from: 1991
Subject Area: Managing Quality
Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile
|Title:||The value of different customer satisfaction and loyalty metrics in predicting customer retention, recommendation, and share-of-wallet|
|Author(s):||Timothy L. Keiningham, (IPSOS Loyalty, Parsippany, New Jersey, USA), Bruce Cooil, (Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA), Lerzan Aksoy, (College of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey), Tor W. Andreassen, (Norwegian School of Management, Department of Marketing, Oslo, Norway), Jay Weiner, (IPSOS Insight, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA)|
|Citation:||Timothy L. Keiningham, Bruce Cooil, Lerzan Aksoy, Tor W. Andreassen, Jay Weiner, (2007) "The value of different customer satisfaction and loyalty metrics in predicting customer retention, recommendation, and share-of-wallet", Managing Service Quality, Vol. 17 Iss: 4, pp.361 - 384|
|Keywords:||Customer loyalty, Customer retention, Customer satisfaction|
|Article type:||Research paper|
|DOI:||10.1108/09604520710760526 (Permanent URL)|
|Publisher:||Emerald Group Publishing Limited|
Purpose – The purpose of this research is to examine different customer satisfaction and loyalty metrics and test their relationship to customer retention, recommendation and share of wallet using micro (customer) level data.
Design/methodology/approach – The data for this study come from a two-year longitudinal Internet panel of over 8,000 US customers of firms in one of three industries (retail banking, mass-merchant retail, and Internet service providers (ISPs)). Correlation analysis, CHAID, and three types of regression analyses (best-subsets, ordinal logistic, and latent class ordinal logistic regression) were used to test the hypotheses.
Findings – Contrary to Reichheld's assertions, the results indicate that recommend intention alone will not suffice as a single predictor of customers' future loyalty behavior. Use of a multiple indicator instead of a single predictor model performs better in predicting customer recommendations and retention.
Research limitations/implications – The limitation of the paper is that it uses data from only three industries.
Practical implications – The presumption of managers when looking at recommend intention as the primary, even sole gauge of customer loyalty appears to be erroneous. The consequence is potential misallocations of resources due to myopic focus on customers' recommend intentions.
Originality/value – This is the first scientific study that examines recommend intentions and its impact on retention and recommendation on the micro (customer) level.
Existing customers: login
to access this document
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian