Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest
Bannner:Try our mobile site beta
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Journal of Knowledge Management

Journal of Knowledge Management

ISSN: 1367-3270

Online from: 1997

Subject Area: Information and Knowledge Management

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Performance of knowledge management practices: a causal analysis


Document Information:
Title:Performance of knowledge management practices: a causal analysis
Author(s):Halil Zaim, (Fatih University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Buyukcekmece, Istanbul, Turkey), Ekrem Tatoglu, (Bahcesehir University, Faculty of Business Administration, Besiktas, Istanbul, Turkey), Selim Zaim, (Fatih University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Buyukcekmece, Istanbul, Turkey.)
Citation:Halil Zaim, Ekrem Tatoglu, Selim Zaim, (2007) "Performance of knowledge management practices: a causal analysis", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 11 Iss: 6, pp.54 - 67
Keywords:Intellectual capital, Knowledge management, Turkey
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/13673270710832163 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

PurposeThe main purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of knowledge management (KM) infrastructure and KM processes on the performance of KM practices.

Design/methodology/approachThe paper is based on personal interviews, data were collected from 83 managers from a single case study of a Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) operator in Turkey.

FindingsThe paper finds that hypotheses were tested using structural equation modeling. Test of hypotheses revealed that both KM processes and KM infrastructure positively and significantly influenced the performance of KM practices. These findings tend to corroborate our conceptual model and are also in line with the existing literature. KM infrastructure was found to be more significantly affecting KM performance than KM processes, indicating that the context and background of KM is more important than the application aspects of KM.

Research limitations/implicationsThe findings in this paper cannot be generalized due to the case study approach. It may not be claimed that both KM processes and KM infrastructure solely determine the performance of KM practices. Instead, there are many other factors that may influence KM performance, which are somewhat beyond the scope of this research.

Practical implicationsThe paper shows that the evaluation of KM performance is expected to increase the effectiveness, efficiency and adaptability of KM efforts so as to add more value to the overall performance of the organization.

Originality/valueIn this paper there is little or no empirical evidence investigating the influence of KM infrastructure and KM processes on KM performance. This paper rectifies this imbalance by clarifying the link between KM infrastructure, processes and performance.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (313kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Order

Fill in an Order form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright info  |  Site Policies
.