Search
  Advanced Search
 
Journal search
Journal cover: International Journal of Conflict Management

International Journal of Conflict Management

ISSN: 1044-4068

Online from: 1990

Subject Area: Management Science/Management Studies

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

 

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

CULTURE, FACE MAINTENANCE, AND STYLES OF HANDLING INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT: A STUDY IN FIVE CULTURES


Document Information:
Title:CULTURE, FACE MAINTENANCE, AND STYLES OF HANDLING INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT: A STUDY IN FIVE CULTURES
Author(s):Stella Ting-Toomey, (California State University, Fullerton), Ge Gao, (San Jose State University), Paula Trubisky, (Fund for Research on Dispute Resolution), Zhizhong Yang, (New York State Psychiatric Institute), Hak Soo Kim, (Sogang University, South Korea), Sung-Ling Lin, (Tunghai University, Taiwan), Tsukasa Nishida, (Nihon University, Japan)
Citation:Stella Ting-Toomey, Ge Gao, Paula Trubisky, Zhizhong Yang, Hak Soo Kim, Sung-Ling Lin, Tsukasa Nishida, (1991) "CULTURE, FACE MAINTENANCE, AND STYLES OF HANDLING INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT: A STUDY IN FIVE CULTURES", International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 2 Iss: 4, pp.275 - 296
Article type:General review
DOI:10.1108/eb022702 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:MCB UP Ltd
Abstract:The objective of this study was to test Ting-Toomey's (1988a) theory on conflict face-negotiation. More specifically, the study examined the relationship between face maintenance dimensions and conflict styles in Japan, China, South Korea, Taiwan, and the United States. The results were summarized as follows: (1) Cultural variability of individualism-collectivism influences two face maintenance dimensions—self-face concern and other-face concern; (2) Cultural variability influences conflict styles, with U.S. members using a higher degree of dominating conflict style than their Japanese and Korean cohorts, and the Chinese and Taiwanese members using a higher degree of obliging and avoiding conflict management styles than their U.S. counterparts; (3) Overall, face maintenance dimensions served as better predictors to conflict styles rather than conflict styles to face dimensions; (4) Self-face maintenance was associated strongly with dominating conflict style, and other-face maintenance was associated strongly with avoiding, integrating, and compromising styles of conflict management. Directions for future testing of the conflict face-negotiation theory were proffered.


Backfiles Disclaimer

Articles that form part of the Emerald Backfiles have been created through digital scanning. Whilst all efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, Emerald will not be held responsible for any inaccuracies. If you require further clarification please contact backfiles@emeraldinsight.com.


Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?
- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (1334kb)

Due to our platform migration, pay-per-view is temporarily unavailable.

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list


Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions