Online from: 1981
Subject Area: Industry and Public Sector Management
|Title:||THE IMPACT OF RAPID POPULATION GROWTH, EXPANDING URBANISATION, AND OTHER FACTORS ON DEVELOPMENT IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA: THE CONTRASTING RESPONSES OF TANZANIA AND KENYA|
|Author(s):||Mary Jo Huth, (Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Dayton)|
|Citation:||Mary Jo Huth, (1984) "THE IMPACT OF RAPID POPULATION GROWTH, EXPANDING URBANISATION, AND OTHER FACTORS ON DEVELOPMENT IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA: THE CONTRASTING RESPONSES OF TANZANIA AND KENYA", International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 4 Iss: 2, pp.1 - 16|
|Article type:||General review|
|DOI:||10.1108/eb012963 (Permanent URL)|
|Publisher:||MCB UP Ltd|
|Abstract:||When the nations of Sub-Saharan Africa won independence some twenty years ago, they faced formidable constraints on development which continue to impede their economic and social progress, despite considerable interim achievements. This article discusses five of these constraints-internal factors based largely on historical circumstances and the physical environment: (1) underdeveloped human resources; (2) military and political conflict; (3) the colonial institutional heritage; (4) climate and geography; and (5) the twin factors of rapid population growth and expanding urbanisation. However, as an urban sociologist, the author will focus on the fifth development constraint and on the contrasting policies Tanzania and Kenya have devised in response to it. These two countries were chosen because while Tanzania is a low-income Sub-Saharan African nation, defined by the World Bank as one with a per capita income of $370 or less, and Kenya is a middle-income Sub-Saharan African nation with a per capita income exceeding $370, Tanzania and Kenya are similar in total population, being the fourth and fifth most populous nations in Sub-Saharan Africa (Nigeria ranks first with a population of 82.6 million; Ethiopia, second, with a population of 30.9 million; Zaire, third, with a population of 27.5 million; Tanzania and Sudan essentially tying for fourth place with populations of 18 million and 17.9 million, respectively; and Kenya, fifth, with a population of 15.3 million, its closest competitors being Uganda with a population of 12.8 million and Ghana with a population of 11.3 million). Moreover, Kenya and Tanzania had the same average annual rate of population growth-3.4 percent-between 1970 and 1980, and their projected populations for the year 2000 are only 1 million apart – 34 million and 35 million, respectively. Even more relevant to the theme of this article, however, is the fact that by 1980 Tanzania had reached nearly the same level of urbanisation – 12 percent and 15 percent, respectively, as well as nearly the same concentration of urban population in their capital or primate cities—50 percent and 57 percent, respectively (World Bank, 1983).|
Articles that form part of the Emerald Backfiles have been created through digital scanning. Whilst all efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, Emerald will not be held responsible for any inaccuracies. If you require further clarification please contact email@example.com.
Existing customers: login
to access this document
Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (1318kb)
Due to our platform migration, pay-per-view is temporarily unavailable.
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian