Online from: 1963
Subject Area: Education
|Title:||AN EVALUATION OF THE SYSTEM OF INSPECTION IN AUSTRALIAN STATE SCHOOLS|
|Author(s):||A.G. MACLAINE, (Senior Lecturer in Education at the University of Sydney. He holds the degrees of B.Ed. (Melbourne), M.A. (Tasmania) and Ph.D. (London). Dr. Maclaine has published extensively. The most recent book of which he is co-editor and co-author is Fundamental Issues in Australian Education (Novak, 1971))|
|Citation:||A.G. MACLAINE, (1973) "AN EVALUATION OF THE SYSTEM OF INSPECTION IN AUSTRALIAN STATE SCHOOLS", Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 11 Iss: 1, pp.22 - 32|
|Article type:||General review|
|DOI:||10.1108/eb009684 (Permanent URL)|
|Publisher:||MCB UP Ltd|
|Abstract:||With the advent of State systems of education in Australia during the latter part of the nineteenth century, inspectors became key figures in the organization of educational policies, to maintain standards of instruction, and to assess the efficiency of teachers and schools. A teacher's promotion was dependent mainly on his seniority in the service and inspectorial assessments of his efficiency. Inspectors were also required to act as educational advisers to teachers, but this role was overshadowed by, and it conflicted with, the inspector's role of assessor. In recent years, there has been a marked change in the inspector's functions, with increased emphasis on professional advice and leadership. Assessment procedures have also been liberalized generally by reducing the frequency of teacher assessments and by broadening and modifying the criteria used to evaluate efficiency. However, it has not been possible to eliminate elements of incompatibility in the inspector's dual role of assessor and adviser, nor has it been possible to devise any reasonably infallible method of grading the complicated task of teaching. The advisory role of inspectors in relation to individual teachers is also being questioned. Such considerations are leading to the further development of alternative ways of stimulating the professional growth of teachers and they also indicate the need for promotion criteria which are largely independent of the inspector.|
Articles that form part of the Emerald Backfiles have been created through digital scanning. Whilst all efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, Emerald will not be held responsible for any inaccuracies. If you require further clarification please contact email@example.com.
Existing customers: login
to access this document
Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (612kb)
Due to our platform migration, pay-per-view is temporarily unavailable.
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian