Search
  Advanced Search
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Reference Services Review

Reference Services Review

ISSN: 0090-7324

Online from: 1973

Subject Area: Library and Information Studies

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Librarian perceptions and information literacy instruction models


Document Information:
Title:Librarian perceptions and information literacy instruction models
Author(s):Erin L. Davis, (Merrill-Cazier Library, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA), Kacy Lundstrom, (Merrill-Cazier Library, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA), Pamela N. Martin, (Merrill-Cazier Library, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA)
Citation:Erin L. Davis, Kacy Lundstrom, Pamela N. Martin, (2011) "Librarian perceptions and information literacy instruction models", Reference Services Review, Vol. 39 Iss: 4, pp.686 - 702
Keywords:Academic libraries, Course-integrated instruction, Credit bearing information literacy, For-credit instruction, Information literacy, Librarians, Teaching librarians, United States of America
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/00907321111186695 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

Purpose – This paper aims to explore both instruction librarians' attitudes on teaching and how they identify themselves as teachers. Particular attention is to be paid to teaching librarians' views on the effectiveness of two types of instruction models: for-credit courses and course-integrated library instruction.

Design/methodology/approach – To investigate librarians' attitudes towards these two models, a survey was constructed targeting librarians who teach information literacy (IL).

Findings – The results indicate that there is an important relationship between the IL instruction model employed and feelings towards campus politics, perceived effectiveness of IL models, and librarians' self-identification as teachers.

Research limitations/implications – The survey was sent to list-servs whose readership includes high percentages of teaching librarians and received 276 responses. This is by no means an exhaustive study. The research is intended to be exploratory and to delve more deeply than the past editorials and blog posts on the issue of comparing for-credit and course-integrated instruction.

Practical implications – This study can help librarians gain a better understanding of how information literacy models impact librarian perceptions of themselves and their role on campus.

Originality/value – The authors seek to transform a discussion that has occurred mostly informally (in blog posts, on list-servs, and in conversations) into a formal investigation of librarians' attitudes towards the two models.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?
- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (153kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list


Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions