Advanced Search
Journal search
Journal cover: Quality Assurance in Education

Quality Assurance in Education

ISSN: 0968-4883

Online from: 1993

Subject Area: Education

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues


Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Strike four! Do-over policies institutionalize GPA distortion

Document Information:
Title:Strike four! Do-over policies institutionalize GPA distortion
Author(s):Jonathan Marx, (Sociology and Anthropology Department, Winthrop University, Rock Hill, South Carolina, USA), David Meeler, (Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Winthrop University, Rock Hill, South Carolina, USA)
Citation:Jonathan Marx, David Meeler, (2013) "Strike four! Do-over policies institutionalize GPA distortion", Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 21 Iss: 1, pp.39 - 53
Keywords:Academic forgiveness, Academic success, Accountability, Assessment, Educational policy, Formula funding, Grade inflation, Registration policy, Retention, Universities
Article type:Case study
DOI:10.1108/09684881311293052 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Acknowledgements:The opinions and perspectives expressed in this piece are the authors solely and are not necessarily shared by host institution or state.

Purpose – The aim of this paper is to illustrate how universities play an institutional role in inflating student grade point averages (GPA) by modifying academic polices such as course withdraw, repeats, and satisfactory/unsatisfactory grade options.

Design/methodology/approach – Three research strategies are employed: an examination of eight public institutions in a southern state illustrates the variability in academic policies; a transcript analysis demonstrates how students at some universities can capitalize on academic regulations to inflate GPA; and an empirical analysis of 1,798 graduating seniors at one institution explores the parameters of utilizing “do-over” policies and how the policies correlate with GPA inflation.

Findings – Schools are transforming the “rules” of the academic game. Such changes enable students to selectively inflate their GPA, thereby rendering effective comparison of GPA problematic. This is of particular significance to administrators, governing and accrediting bodies, potential employers, graduate or professional school recruiters, and policy makers.

Research limitations/implications – This study is cross-sectional and the sample is restricted to one state and in some analyses one institution. Longitudinal research exploring a larger number of universities in a variety of states is necessary to uncover the determinants of any changes in academic policies.

Originality/value – The paper reframes grade inflation as GPA inflation, which is partially a function of institutionalized processes, and offers a remedy to the problem of GPA comparison. A new simple metric (EAR) is offered to accompany GPA; only when considering earned hours versus attempted hours (EAR) does grade point regain some utility to educators, recruiters, or policy makers engaged in assessment.

Fulltext Options:



Existing customers: login
to access this document


- Forgot password?
- Athens/Institutional login



Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (91kb)

Due to our platform migration, pay-per-view is temporarily unavailable.

To purchase this item please login or register.


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian

Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions