Advanced Search
Journal search
Journal cover: Library Hi Tech

Library Hi Tech

ISSN: 0737-8831

Online from: 1983

Subject Area: Library and Information Studies

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues


Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Who is following us? Data mining a library's Twitter followers

Document Information:
Title:Who is following us? Data mining a library's Twitter followers
Author(s):Robin R. Sewell, (Medical Sciences Library, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA)
Citation:Robin R. Sewell, (2013) "Who is following us? Data mining a library's Twitter followers", Library Hi Tech, Vol. 31 Iss: 1, pp.160 - 170
Keywords:Data mining, Graduate, Libraries, Social media, Social networking, Twitter, Undergraduate
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/07378831311303994 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Purpose – Twitter is an increasingly popular social networking tool for libraries to use to reach out to their patrons, but very little research has been done to determine who is following library tweets. The aim of the paper is to use the existing Twitter follower information for the Sterling Evans Library at Texas A&M as a test bed to determine the composition of Evans Twitter followers. The Medical Sciences Library's primary user groups are made up largely of graduate and professional students, making the difference in the number of graduate and undergraduate followers of particular interest.

Design/methodology/approach – Follower data were gathered from the Evans Twitter page and each user was identified and categorized. Additional data were collected on the number of tweets, and the state of the account, active or inactive.

Findings – A total of 432 follower accounts were examined. A total of 54.37 percent were identified as affiliated with Texas A&M University. The largest group of followers were students (23.61 percent), made up primarily of undergraduates (81.05 percent). Faculty/staff (7.64 percent) showed very little participation. Unaffiliated followers included corporations (19.68 percent), alumni (11.57 percent), and other libraries or librarians (7.64 percent).

Originality/value – Very little can be found in the library literature on Twitter follower analysis. This is the first large and detailed analysis of library Twitter followers.

Fulltext Options:



Existing customers: login
to access this document


- Forgot password?
- Athens/Institutional login



Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (79kb)

Due to our platform migration, pay-per-view is temporarily unavailable.

To purchase this item please login or register.


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian

Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions