Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest
Bannner:Try our mobile site beta
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Equal Opportunities International

Equal Opportunities International

ISSN: 0261-0159
Currently published as: Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal

Online from: 1981

Subject Area: Accounting and Finance

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Small firms, the paid maternity leave debate in Australia and the business case


Document Information:
Title:Small firms, the paid maternity leave debate in Australia and the business case
Author(s):Rowena Barrett, (Department of Human Resource Management, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK), Susan Mayson, (Department of Management, Monash University, Caulfield East, Australia)
Citation:Rowena Barrett, Susan Mayson, (2008) "Small firms, the paid maternity leave debate in Australia and the business case", Equal Opportunities International, Vol. 27 Iss: 3, pp.276 - 291
Keywords:Australia, Human resource management, Maternity leave, Small enterprises, Women workers
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/02610150810860093 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the management of maternity leave in small firms and particularly to explore the perceived costs and benefits of paid maternity leave (PML). PML is a universal right in some countries (i.e. the UK), but not in Australia where most private sector female employees only have access to 12 months unpaid maternity leave. It also aims to explore how the business case for (or against) PML is constructed in small firms.

Design/methodology/approach – The study was limited to smaller firms operating in the business services sector in the same regional area. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight employers and female employees in six of these firms. Analysis by theme was undertaken within and across interview transcripts.

Findings – Not one of these small firm employers offered PML and the cost of doing so was not considered to outweigh the benefits already realised through the (legislated) unpaid maternity leave scheme. In these firms maternity leave was managed in an informal way with notions of flexibility – give and take – characterising what happens.

Originality/value – The paper addresses the lack of research on access to family-related leave policies in small firms. Employer and employee views of the issue are drawn upon, the latter not often being heard. The paper contributes to understanding the construction of the business case for a specific issue in smaller firms and human resource management from a resource-based view more generally in smaller firms.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (127kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Order

Fill in an Order form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright info  |  Site Policies
.