Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest
Bannner:Try our mobile site beta
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Management Decision

Management Decision

ISSN: 0025-1747
Incorporates: Journal of Management History (Archive)

Online from: 1967

Subject Area: Management Science/Management Studies

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

How failure to align organizational climate and leadership style affects performance


Document Information:
Title:How failure to align organizational climate and leadership style affects performance
Author(s):Dorthe Døjbak Haakonsson, (Aarhus School of Business, University of Aarhus, Centre for Organizational Renewal and Evolution, Aarhus, Denmark), Richard M. Burton, (Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA), Børge Obel, (Aarhus School of Business, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark), Jørgen Lauridsen, (Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark)
Citation:Dorthe Døjbak Haakonsson, Richard M. Burton, Børge Obel, Jørgen Lauridsen, (2008) "How failure to align organizational climate and leadership style affects performance", Management Decision, Vol. 46 Iss: 3, pp.406 - 432
Keywords:Climatology, Contingency planning, Information control, Leadership
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/00251740810863861 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate how misalignments between the organizational climate (measured as information-processing demand) and the leadership style (measured as information-processing capability) may result in negative performance consequences.

Design/methodology/approach – The empirical part of the paper is based on questionnaire data. Key informant is the CEO and thus there is a focus on the CEO's perception of climate and leadership style. Data are subjected to regression analysis.

Findings – The results indicate that misalignments between climate and leadership style are problematic for organizational performance. This is supported by the empirical findings that show partial support for three out of four hypotheses and full support for the fourth hypothesis.

Research limitations/implications – Data cover information on Danish small- and medium-sized firms. These cross-sectional data and cannot study the effects of misalignments over time.

Practical implications – Because the findings show that misalignments between climate and leadership style are problematic to organizational level of performance, this implies that in case of misfits either the climate or the leadership style must be changed.

Originality/value – The main contribution of the paper is that the framework allows an explicit understanding of which managerial actions are needed to manage particular types of climate. Further, the framework enables an understanding of how misalignments may result in poor performance.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (244kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Order

Fill in an Order form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright info  |  Site Policies
.