Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest
Bannner:Try our mobile site beta
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Chinese Management Studies

Chinese Management Studies

ISSN: 1750-614X

Online from: 2007

Subject Area: Regional Management Studies

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Icon: .Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Diversification of Chinese companies: an international comparison


Document Information:
Title:Diversification of Chinese companies: an international comparison
Author(s):Joseph P.H. Fan, (School of Business Administration, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China), Jun Huang, (School of Accountancy, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, People's Republic of China), Felix Oberholzer-Gee, (Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA), Troy D. Smith, (Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA), Mengxin Zhao, (Department of Finance, Bentley College, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA)
Citation:Joseph P.H. Fan, Jun Huang, Felix Oberholzer-Gee, Troy D. Smith, Mengxin Zhao, (2008) "Diversification of Chinese companies: an international comparison", Chinese Management Studies, Vol. 2 Iss: 1, pp.6 - 13
Keywords:Business development, China, Diversification, Nationalization
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/17506140810866223 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Acknowledgements:Jun Huang thanks the support of the MOE Project of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Science in University.
Abstract:

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a systematic comparison of the level of business diversification in China and eight other large economies for the 2001-2005 period. The reasons why publicly listed Chinese firms are more diversified than companies elsewhere are investigated.

Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected on the number of business segments in which publicly traded companies operate from the Thomson One Banker database and analyzed using non-parametric tests and regression analysis.

Findings – The mean number of business segments per firm varies significantly by country. Notably, there is no evidence in the authors' sample that emerging-market companies are systematically more diversified than their developed-market counterparts. In most countries, firms have become less diversified over time. However, there is no such trend in China. The level of diversification of Chinese enterprises does not vary over the authors' study period (2001-2005), making Chinese firms the most diversified in the sample by 2005. China's growth rate does not seem to explain the higher level of firm diversification. However, the authors find that Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) diversify their operations more aggressively than other Chinese firms.

Research limitations/implications – Ownership data and business group affiliations were not available for all firms in the sample, making it difficult to control for these effects across economies. The study's findings are limited to publicly traded firms.

Practical implications – Government involvement in SOEs may be contributing to a divergence in the pattern of business diversification between China and other economies.

Originality/value – This paper quantifies anecdotal evidence that Chinese firms are more diversified than similar firms in other countries.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (59kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Order

Fill in an Order form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright info  |  Site Policies
.