Advanced Search
Journal search
Journal cover: Benchmarking: An International Journal

Benchmarking: An International Journal

ISSN: 1463-5771
Previously published as: Benchmarking for Quality Management & Technology

Online from: 1999

Subject Area: Managing Quality

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues


Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Benchmarking and performance measurement: a statistical analysis

Document Information:
Title:Benchmarking and performance measurement: a statistical analysis
Author(s):Sandra Moffett, (School of Computing and Intelligent Systems, University of Ulster, Londonderry, UK), Karen Anderson-Gillespie, (Belfast City Council, Belfast, UK), Rodney McAdam, (School of Business Organisation and Management, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, UK)
Citation:Sandra Moffett, Karen Anderson-Gillespie, Rodney McAdam, (2008) "Benchmarking and performance measurement: a statistical analysis", Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 15 Iss: 4, pp.368 - 381
Keywords:Benchmarking, Performance measures, Statistical analysis
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/14635770810887203 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the theoretical understanding and practical application of lead benchmarking and performance measurement as a way to achieve organisational change.

Design/methodology/approach – The paper combines a theory building/theory testing approach. Based on literary findings a conceptual model has been postulated to identify constructs associated with upstream performance measurement and lead benchmarking. A selection of research questions are posed and tested via empirical study. The survey instrument was distributed to 800 UK organisations which resulted in 157 responses.

Findings – Results from the empirical research indicate that new lead, forward looking, predictive benchmarks need to be developed to support lead benchmarking and performance measurement activities. Furthermore, it was found that currently larger organisations are more likely to adopt these practices, with considerable variation across organisational sectors.

Research limitations/implications – The empirical research achieved a 19.6 per cent response rate. While this is adequate to report statistical representation, further data collection would be beneficial for industry generalisations.

Practical implications – Many organisations struggle to grasp metric measurement for lead benchmarking. This paper may provide insight into key factors to be considered for lead benchmarking uptake.

Originality/value – This paper builds on current literature and develops a conceptual model which is then tested via empirical research. This is a novel approach in the area of lead benchmarking.

Fulltext Options:



Existing customers: login
to access this document


- Forgot password?
- Athens/Institutional login



Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (89kb)

Due to our platform migration, pay-per-view is temporarily unavailable.

To purchase this item please login or register.


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian

Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions