Online from: 1990
Subject Area: Operations and Logistics Management
Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile
|Title:||Supply chain integration and performance: a review of the evidence|
|Author(s):||Nathalie Fabbe-Costes, (Centre de Recherche sur le Transport et la LOGistigue, Universite de la Mediterranne-Aix-Marseille II, Aix-en-Provence, France), Marianne Jahre, (Department of Strategy and Logistics, BI Norwegian School of Management, Oslo, Norway)|
|Citation:||Nathalie Fabbe-Costes, Marianne Jahre, (2008) "Supply chain integration and performance: a review of the evidence", International Journal of Logistics Management, The, Vol. 19 Iss: 2, pp.130 - 154|
|Keywords:||Classification, Operations management, Supply chain management|
|Article type:||Literature review|
|DOI:||10.1108/09574090810895933 (Permanent URL)|
|Publisher:||Emerald Group Publishing Limited|
|Acknowledgements:||The authors gratefully thank the anonymous referees for comments and suggestions for improvements of the first version of this paper. They also acknowledge the guest editor for this special issue. They express their gratitude to Peter Tatham for the proofreading of the paper.|
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyse papers studying the link between supply chain integration (SCI) and performance, and to discuss reported empirical evidence relating to this fundamental question for logistics and supply chain management.
Design/methodology/approach – A systematic analysis of 38 papers published in nine important journals in logistics, supply chain and operations management during the period 2000-2006 is offered. Using a multidimensional framework to sort and classify selected papers, structured results are provided for the purpose of contributing to discussion of the topic.
Findings – More SCI does not always improve performance. Definitions and measures of SCI and performance are diverse to the extent that a conclusion such as “the more (SCI) the better (the performance) cannot be drawn”. On the contrary more empirical research, with use of clear definitions and good measures, are needed. The conclusions drawn from the analytical literature review provide a basis from which further research can be developed, both in respect of research approaches, definitions of main concepts and the choice of theoretical basis.
Research limitations/implications – Additional journals could be included. The framework could be more detailed. More details on SCI and performance measures, as well as the items used in the papers, could be provided and discussed.
Practical implications – Results encourage researchers and practitioners to be more cautious concerning SCI and its impact on performance and to have a more conscious and differentiated view of SCI.
Originality/value – Through a rigorous analysis of prevailing research, the paper questions a common assumption in business logistics and SCM. Propositions for further research are suggested.
Existing customers: login
to access this document
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian