Search
  Advanced Search
 
Journal search
Journal cover: International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

ISSN: 0952-6862

Online from: 1988

Subject Area: Health Care Management/Healthcare

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Automated versus manual audit in the emergency department


Document Information:
Title:Automated versus manual audit in the emergency department
Author(s):Steven Doherty, (Rural Clinical School, University of Newcastle, Tamworth, Australia), Lin Davis, (Hunter New England Health, Tamworth, Australia), Paul Leschke, (Nambour Health Service, Nambour, Australia), Anna Valpiani, (Nambour Health Service, Nambour, Australia), Emma Whitely, (Tamworth Rural Referral Hospital, Tamworth, Australia), Della Yarnold, (Hunter New England Health, New Lambton, Australia), Helen Stevens, (Hunter New England Health, Armidale, Australia)
Citation:Steven Doherty, Lin Davis, Paul Leschke, Anna Valpiani, Emma Whitely, Della Yarnold, Helen Stevens, (2008) "Automated versus manual audit in the emergency department", International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 21 Iss: 7, pp.671 - 678
Keywords:Accident and emergency, Auditing, Australia, Data analysis
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/09526860810910140 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to compare data collected by automated form processing with manual data collection for clinical indicators (CIs) in paediatric emergency medicine.

Design/methodology/approach – Paediatric patients presenting with croup, asthma, bronchiolitis, head injury and gastroenteritis in August 2006 were identified by ICD 9 coding and a traditional manual audit was performed by two data collectors. Data were collected on a total of 16 CIs for these five illnesses. Manual audit data were then compared to information collected for this same patient population using TELEform™, an automated forms processing (AFP) system that had been employed for over two years.

Findings – Teleform™ data were only available for 24 patients compared to information for 127 patients identified by ICD 9 coding and manual audit. Teleform™ data overestimated compliance with clinical guidelines by 17 percent giving an overall departmental agreement with CIs of 90.6 percent compared to 73.5 percent in the manual audit. Additionally, manual audit demonstrated that when the clinical guideline was incorporated into the clinical record, compliance was 92.5 percent compared to 51.3 percent when it was not.

Originality/value – This single center study demonstrates that data collected by AFP such as TELEform™, overestimate emergency department performance regarding CIs compliance. Departments that use automated data collection tools need to establish relationships between such data and data collected via more traditional auditing methods.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?
- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (85kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list


Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions