Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest
Bannner:Try our mobile site beta
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Business Strategy Series

Business Strategy Series

ISSN: 1751-5637
Previously published as: Handbook of Business Strategy

Online from: 2007

Subject Area: Strategy

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

The relationship between organizational justice and conflict style


Document Information:
Title:The relationship between organizational justice and conflict style
Author(s):B. Charles Tatum, (Associate (Level 3) based at Booz Allen Hamilton, San Diego, California, USA), Richard J. Eberlin, (Management Development Professional based at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA)
Citation:B. Charles Tatum, Richard J. Eberlin, (2008) "The relationship between organizational justice and conflict style", Business Strategy Series, Vol. 9 Iss: 6, pp.297 - 305
Keywords:Conflict management, Conflict resolution, Justice, Leadership, Team working
Article type:Conceptual paper
DOI:10.1108/17515630810923603 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate relationships between organizational justice and conflict management.

Design/methodology/approach – Two vignettes are described that illustrate: a manager who is highly sensitive to organizational justice issues; and a manager who disregards organizational justice issues. We describe likely conflict management styles adopted by these two managers, and the effects these styles might have on organizations and the employees.

Findings – A manager who is sensitive to organizational justice issues is more likely aware of potential conflicts that might arise during an encounter with an employee. The most likely and beneficial approach to addressing conflict for this manager is collaboration. In contrast, the insensitive manager tends to be more concerned with procedure than with the fairness or openness of processes. During a potentially high conflict situation, the manager who is not concerned with organizational justice tends to resort to conflict resolution styles that impose a competitive or dominating resolution tactic.

Research limitations/implications – Because this article is theoretical and conceptual in nature, the findings must be confirmed with additional empirical evidence.

Practical implications – Recent changes in globalization suggest that we need to learn to survive in less hierarchical environments and rely more heavily on teams. Careful attention to organizational justice will ensure that we deliver a workforce that is able to meet the new demands with fewer distracting conflicts.

Originality/value – Resolving conflict and working together in just and fair systems is important in today's global playing field. This article systematically integrates, for the first time, the literature on organizational justice and conflict management.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (151kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Order

Fill in an Order form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright info  |  Site Policies
.