Finding open access articles using Google, Google Scholar, OAIster and OpenDOAR

doi:10.1108/14684520810923881

Login

Welcome:
Guest

Search for:

Browse:

Resources:

Online Information Review

ISSN: 1468-4527

Online from: 1977

Subject Area: Library and Information Studies

Content: Latest Issue | Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Finding open access articles using Google, Google Scholar, OAIster and OpenDOAR

Document Information:
Title:	Finding open access articles using Google, Google Scholar, OAIster and OpenDOAR
Author(s):	Michael Norris, (Department of Information Science, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK), Charles Oppenheim, (Department of Information Science, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK), Fytton Rowland, (Department of Information Science, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK)
Citation:	Michael Norris, Charles Oppenheim, Fytton Rowland, (2008) "Finding open access articles using Google, Google Scholar, OAIster and OpenDOAR", Online Information Review, Vol. 32 Iss: 6, pp.709 - 715
Keywords:	Information searches, Internet, Retrieval performance evalution
Article type:	Research paper
DOI:	10.1108/14684520810923881 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:	Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Acknowledgements:	© The authors 2008.
Abstract:	Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the relative effectiveness of a range of search tools in finding open access (OA) versions of peer reviewed academic articles on the world wide web. Design/methodology/approach – Some background is given on why and how academics may make their articles OA and how they may be found by others searching for them. Google, Google Scholar, OAIster and OpenDOAR were used to try to locate OA versions of peer reviewed journal articles drawn from three subjects (ecology, economics and sociology). Findings – Of the 2,519 articles, 967 were found to have OA versions on the world wide web. Google and Google Scholar found 76.84 per cent of them. The results from OpenDOAR and OAIster were disappointing, but some improvements are noted. Only in economics could OAIster and OpenDOAR be considered relative successes. Originality/value – The paper shows the relative effectiveness of the search tools in these three subjects. The results indicate that those wanting to find OA articles in these subjects, for the moment at least should use the general search engines Google and Google Scholar first rather than OpenDOAR or OAIster.