Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest
Bannner:Try our mobile site beta
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Performance Measurement and Metrics

Performance Measurement and Metrics

ISSN: 1467-8047

Online from: 2000

Subject Area: Library and Information Studies

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

When the evidence is not enough: Organizational factors that influence effective and successful library assessment


Document Information:
Title:When the evidence is not enough: Organizational factors that influence effective and successful library assessment
Author(s):Steve Hiller, (University of Washington Libraries, Seattle, Washington, USA), Martha Kyrillidou, (Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC, USA), Jim Self, (University of Virginia Library, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA)
Citation:Steve Hiller, Martha Kyrillidou, Jim Self, (2008) "When the evidence is not enough: Organizational factors that influence effective and successful library assessment", Performance Measurement and Metrics, Vol. 9 Iss: 3, pp.223 - 230
Keywords:Assessment, Decision making, Libraries, Organizational analysis
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/14678040810928444 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to report on the findings of the two-year Association of Research Libraries (ARL) sponsored project, “Making Library Assessment Work: Practical Approaches to Effective and Sustainable Assessment,”; it aims to examine the organizational factors that facilitate and impede effective data use and the implications for assessment in research libraries.

Design/methodology/approach – Information was gathered from a variety of sources, including: a self-evaluation of assessment activities and needs done by each of the 24 participating libraries; extensive discussion with a designated contact at each library; a review of library and institutional sources such as annual reports, strategic plans, accreditation self-studies, ARL and IPEDS statistics; and the observations and discussion that occurred during 1.5 day site visits.

Findings – The paper finds that libraries surveyed have made some progress incorporating data in decision making and services improvement, but there is much work to be done.

Originality/value – This is not an evidence-based practice study but rather one that examines why evidence (the data on which a decision may be based) is not used more widely in libraries.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (65kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Order

Fill in an Order form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright info  |  Site Policies
.