Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest
Bannner:Try our mobile site beta
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing

Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing

ISSN: 0885-8624

Online from: 1986

Subject Area: Marketing

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Icon: .

Capturing and (re)interpreting complexity in multi-firm disruptive product innovations


Document Information:
Title:Capturing and (re)interpreting complexity in multi-firm disruptive product innovations
Author(s):Hugh M. Pattinson, (University of Technology, Sydney, Australia), Arch G. Woodside, (Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA)
Citation:Hugh M. Pattinson, Arch G. Woodside, (2008) "Capturing and (re)interpreting complexity in multi-firm disruptive product innovations", Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 24 Iss: 1, pp.61 - 76
Keywords:Complexity theory, Diffusion, Innovation, Software engineering
Article type:Case study
DOI:10.1108/08858620910923711 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Acknowledgements:The authors acknowledge with appreciation the extensive comments by Wesley Johnston and reviewers on three earlier drafts of this article.
Abstract:

Purpose – This case study research report aims to include collecting additional field interviews with the original and additional executives participating in the original case study (on the Zaplet software applications firm) to enhance the interpretations by the original case study investigators as well as add-in downstream events occurring after the original report. The focus of the study is to increase descriptive knowledge and understanding of innovation and diffusion processes in developing high-tech disruptive software technologies.

Design/methodology/approach – The study includes an application of the long-interview method and reinterpretation of original case data along with preparing and interpreting decision system analysis and chronological maps.

Findings – The reinterpretation and expansion of the original case study illustrate dramatic revisions in plans and implementing new applications following positive and negative responses by third-parties and lead-user customers to alpha and beta designs. Concrete field trials occur frequently in shaping where and how the firm goes about changing its direction. Third-parties play critical roles in multiple time periods in shaping the firm's new product development direction.

Research limitations/implications – The case study reanalysis and expansion are generalizable to innovation and diffusion theory and not to a specific population of firms.

Practical implications – The paper illustrates the wisdom of Tom Peter's dictum, “Put it to tin quickly” and Dwight Eisenhower's focus on improvising, “The plan is nothing, planning is everything.”

Originality/value – Formal sensemaking of what happened helps to destroy the myth that executives must have the resources before innovating. Resources follow vision and action (implementing) is the hidden and great lesson of this paper – what Tom Peters means when he writes about the value in creating a “skunk works” – using “borrowed” time, material, places, and creative juices to make things happen.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (1093kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Order

Fill in an Order form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright info  |  Site Policies
.