Previously published as: Integrated Manufacturing Systems
Online from: 2004
Subject Area: Operations and Logistics Management
Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile
|Title:||An exploratory survey of current practice in the medical device industry|
|Author(s):||Julie Eatock, (DISC, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK), Dorian Dixon, (NIBEC, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, UK), Terry Young, (DISC, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK)|
|Citation:||Julie Eatock, Dorian Dixon, Terry Young, (2009) "An exploratory survey of current practice in the medical device industry", Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 20 Iss: 2, pp.218 - 234|
|Keywords:||Corporate strategy, Manufacturing industries, Medical equipment|
|Article type:||Research paper|
|DOI:||10.1108/17410380910929637 (Permanent URL)|
|Publisher:||Emerald Group Publishing Limited|
|Acknowledgements:||The authors would like to acknowledge Dr Michael Craven at the University of Nottingham who designed the in-depth interview instrument, and all of the authors' MATCH colleagues who also conducted interviews. The authors would like to thank the referees for their very helpful comments and suggestions while reviewing this paper. This work has been funded by the MATCH Programme (EPSRC Grant GR/S29874/01). The views expressed, however, are entirely those of the authors.|
Purpose – This study seeks to examine the extent to which mainstream tools and strategies are applied in the medical devices sector, which is highly fragmented and contains a high percentage of small companies, and to determine if company size impacts on manufacturing strategy selection.
Design/methodology/approach – A questionnaire was developed and disseminated through a number of channels. Responses were received from 38 companies in the UK and Ireland, describing 68 products taken to market in the past five years.
Findings – Because of the limited scope of the survey, the findings are indicative rather than conclusive, and interesting trends have emerged. New to the world products were much more likely to exceed company expectations of market success compared to derivative products. It was found that the majority of these innovative products were developed by small companies. Large companies appear to favour minor upgrades over major upgrades even though these prove – on the data presented – to be less successful overall.
Practical implications – These results provide those engaged in this sector with comparative information and some insights for further improvement. The reported trends with respect to company size and product complexity (or degree of novelty) are particularly illuminating. Academically, this sets some expected trends on a firmer footing and unearths one or two unexpected findings.
Originality/value – It is believed that this is the largest survey of determinants of success in UK medical device companies and it provides a comparison with other sectors.
Existing customers: login
to access this document
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian