Online from: 2001
Subject Area: Built Environment
Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile
|Title:||Innovation and small residential builders: an Australian study|
|Author(s):||David Thorpe, (Faculty of Engineering and Surveying, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Australia), Neal Ryan, (Southern Cross University, Lismore, Australia), Michael B. Charles, (Faculty of Business and Law, Southern Cross University, Tweed Heads, Australia)|
|Citation:||David Thorpe, Neal Ryan, Michael B. Charles, (2009) "Innovation and small residential builders: an Australian study", Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, Vol. 9 Iss: 2, pp.184 - 200|
|Keywords:||Australia, Construction industry, Innovation, Small to medium-sized enterprises|
|Article type:||Research paper|
|DOI:||10.1108/14714170910950821 (Permanent URL)|
|Publisher:||Emerald Group Publishing Limited|
Purpose – Through investigating the innovation-adoption process in smaller construction industry firms, this paper aims to ascertain the drivers of innovation in Australian small residential building firms, and determine how such firms develop or adopt innovations. The research thus provides a more thoroughly nuanced understanding of the innovation-adoption process within these firms.
Design/methodology/approach – The research described in this paper was conducted among small residential housing contractors in South-East Queensland, Australia. This was undertaken by means of a semi-structured interview process, based on a questionnaire requesting information from owners or managers.
Findings – Innovation in this sector is driven by general business concerns pertaining to maintaining overall competitiveness rather than specific client needs. The same firms also utilize supply-chain relationships and broader industry associations as sources of external knowledge. Despite this, better pathways to transfer externally generated knowledge require implementation, especially as a means to ensure continued sector growth and deliver public goods such as enhanced worker health and environmental sustainability.
Practical implications – The paper highlights the current communication and informational disjuncture between research institutions and practitioners. As a result, workable suggestions for enhanced and meaningful interaction among firms, peak bodies and key research institutions are advanced.
Originality/value – The study complements previous research on innovation development and adoption. Given that there is little previous research on the innovation-adoption process in the residential building sector, the paper provides an important counterpoint to studies that generally focus on much larger construction firms.
Existing customers: login
to access this document
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian