Online from: 1899
Subject Area: Industry and Public Sector Management
Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile
|Title:||The nutritional and toxicological value of organic vegetables: Consumer perception versus scientific evidence|
|Author(s):||Christine Hoefkens, (Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium), Wim Verbeke, (Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium), Joris Aertsens, (Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium), Koen Mondelaers, (Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium), John Van Camp, (Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium)|
|Citation:||Christine Hoefkens, Wim Verbeke, Joris Aertsens, Koen Mondelaers, John Van Camp, (2009) "The nutritional and toxicological value of organic vegetables: Consumer perception versus scientific evidence", British Food Journal, Vol. 111 Iss: 10, pp.1062 - 1077|
|Keywords:||Belgium, Consumers, Organic foods, Perception, Safety, Vegetables|
|Article type:||Literature review|
|DOI:||10.1108/00070700920992916 (Permanent URL)|
|Publisher:||Emerald Group Publishing Limited|
|Acknowledgements:||The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Ministry of the Flemish Community (Department of Sustainable Agricultural Development – ADLO). The authors would also like to thank Jeen Van Den Berg for his contribution to this work in the form of a Master's thesis.|
Purpose – The present study aims to explore and compare consumer perception and scientific evidence related to food quality and food safety aspects of organic versus conventional vegetables.
Design/methodology/approach – Primary data on consumer perception were gathered in 2006-2007 through a consumer survey with Flemish adults (
Findings – It was found that organic vegetables are perceived as containing less contaminants and more nutrients, and as such, being healthier and safer compared to conventional vegetables. However, not enough evidence is currently available in the literature to support or refute such a perception, indicating a certain mismatch between consumer perception and scientific evidence. The gap between perception and evidence is larger among older consumers with children. The perception is stronger when the consumption frequency is higher, but is independent of gender, place of residence (rural or urban), education and income level. Also non-users, on average, perceive that organic vegetables have a nutritional and toxicological advantage over conventional vegetables.
Research limitations/implications – A non-probability convenience sampling method was applied which limits generalisation of the findings beyond the sample characteristics.
Originality/value – This paper is original in comparing consumer perception and scientific facts related to both nutritional and safety aspects of organic versus conventional vegetables.
Existing customers: login
to access this document
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian