Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest
Bannner:Try our mobile site beta
 
Journal search
Journal cover: International Journal of Law and Management

International Journal of Law and Management

ISSN: 1754-243X
Previously published as: Managerial Law

Online from: 2008

Subject Area: Business Ethics and Law

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Icon: .Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Recent changes in the evidential requirements in indirect sex and race discrimination cases


Document Information:
Title:Recent changes in the evidential requirements in indirect sex and race discrimination cases
Author(s):Sam Middlemiss, (Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK), Margaret Downie, (Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK)
Citation:Sam Middlemiss, Margaret Downie, (2009) "Recent changes in the evidential requirements in indirect sex and race discrimination cases", International Journal of Law and Management, Vol. 51 Iss: 6, pp.367 - 373
Keywords:Discrimination, Evidence, Laws and legislation, Race discrimination, Sexual discrimination
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/17542430911005909 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to critically analyse the impact of recent case law on the various evidential requirements in the area of indirect sex and indirect race discrimination in employment. It is intended to distil from the case law a comprehensive summary of the evidential requirements which an applicant in such a case must meet in order to succeed.

Design/methodology/approach – The evidential issues and the requirements to be fulfilled by an applicant in such cases will be identified and analysed by means of a review of the case law in this area.

Findings – Despite attempts of the courts to clarify the evidential requirements in this type of case, the law in this area remains complicated and confusing. Close analysis of the case law results in the identification and clarification of particular evidential “hurdles” which an applicant must clear in order to succeed.

Originality/value – The effect of these requirements results in a burden on an applicant in a case of indirect discrimination which is difficult to meet and the identification and clarification of the main issues will allow an applicant to focus on these requirements and increase the chances of a successful outcome. In this way the protection afforded by the law on indirect discrimination will become more effective. The findings are also useful in explaining to managers the nature and impact of the case law in this area.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (66kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Order

Fill in an Order form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright info  |  Site Policies
..