Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest
Bannner:Try our mobile site beta
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management

Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management

ISSN: 1471-4175

Online from: 2001

Subject Area: Built Environment

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Benchmarking a new design management system using process simulation approach


Document Information:
Title:Benchmarking a new design management system using process simulation approach
Author(s):Hemanta Doloi, (Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia)
Citation:Hemanta Doloi, (2010) "Benchmarking a new design management system using process simulation approach", Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, Vol. 10 Iss: 1, pp.42 - 59
Keywords:Balanced scorecard, Benchmarking, Construction industry, Design and development, Project management, Simulation
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/14714171011017563 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to put forward a research-based argument on the benefits of simulation approach in managing design at an early stage of a project. Having selected an optimal design configuration, the operational uncertainties can be removed and investment decisions are fully justified over the lifecycle of projects.

Design/methodology/approach – A simulation-based methodology embodying balanced scorecard (BSC) for measuring the operational and business performance has been synthesised in the research. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) has been employed to evaluate the trade-offs between feasible design alternatives and to select the optimum design configuration.

Findings – The findings show that the integrated framework developed in this research by integrating simulation technology, BSC and MCDA adds significant contributions in improving the current body of knowledge in the design management practices.

Research limitations/implications – The framework should further be tested by applying to large engineering projects in order for realising the benefits in the decision-appraisal process. Access to data in large projects before implementation would be the greatest challenge from a commercial-in-confidence perspective.

Practical implications – The framework will help the practitioner's understanding and management of the design configuration in highly complex modern projects. This will allow the decision makers to manage interdependency of complex processes and select optimal designs upfront. The resulting framework will significantly contribute to reducing scope creeps and cost variations and thereby reducing contractual disputes in projects.

Originality/value – The original design of the integrated framework of this kind for managing design complexity in projects adds significant value in the design management practices. The use of simulation embodying BSC and MCDA adds significant novelty in theoretical advancement of contemporary knowledge in the design management profession.



Icon: Access.Document Options:

Content access

References

Further reading

Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright info  |  Site Policies
.