Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest
Bannner:Try our mobile site beta
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Management Decision

Management Decision

ISSN: 0025-1747
Incorporates: Journal of Management History (Archive)

Online from: 1967

Subject Area: Management Science/Management Studies

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

The sharing, protection and thievery of intellectual assets: The case of the Formula 1 industry


Document Information:
Title:The sharing, protection and thievery of intellectual assets: The case of the Formula 1 industry
Author(s):Maria Solitander, (Department of Management and Organization, Hanken School of Economics and Business Administration, Helsinki, Finland), Nikodemus Solitander, (Department of Marketing, Hanken School of Economics and Business Administration, Helsinki, Finland)
Citation:Maria Solitander, Nikodemus Solitander, (2010) "The sharing, protection and thievery of intellectual assets: The case of the Formula 1 industry", Management Decision, Vol. 48 Iss: 1, pp.37 - 57
Keywords:Intangible assets, Intellectual capital, Job mobility, Knowledge management
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/00251741011014445 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyze how the Intellectual Capital perspective can be altered in order to include ethically questionable practices of knowledge acquisition.

Design/methodology/approach – The paper explores the relationship between formal and illicit forms of intellectual capital acquisition through a case study of the Formula 1 industry. The paper is based on secondary data from public sources.

Findings – Ethically questionable practices are a part of the knowledge economy. In the case study, the view on what was ethical and accepted was changed due to uncovered practices of espionage.

Practical implications – Firms in knowledge-intensive industries often employ unrecognized informal channels for intellectual capital acquisition. Managers should consider the boundary between right and wrong in their particular industry, and whether they have the tools for dealing with ethically questionable practices.

Originality/value – The paper suggests a complementary interpretation of the Formula 1 industry not only as a best-practice case of how community and trust knowledge spillovers facilitate innovation, but also how ethically questionable practices of intellectual capital acquisition exist as an accepted part of the process.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (259kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Order

Fill in an Order form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright info  |  Site Policies
.