Online from: 2006
Subject Area: Management Science/Management Studies
Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile
|Title:||Ansoff revisited: How Ansoff interfaces with both the planning and learning schools of thought in strategy|
|Author(s):||Robert Moussetis, (Department of Management and Marketing, North Central College, Naperville, Illinois, USA)|
|Citation:||Robert Moussetis, (2011) "Ansoff revisited: How Ansoff interfaces with both the planning and learning schools of thought in strategy", Journal of Management History, Vol. 17 Iss: 1, pp.102 - 125|
|Keywords:||Business history, Management history, Management strategy, Management theory, Strategic change, Strategic management|
|Article type:||Research paper|
|DOI:||10.1108/17511341111099556 (Permanent URL)|
|Publisher:||Emerald Group Publishing Limited|
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to revisit Igor Ansoff's work and how it interfaces with the various schools of strategic management.
Design/methodology/approach – Ansoff's work of 40 years is reviewed and related to other schools of thought in strategic management.
Findings – Ansoff's work is much more comprehensive than the literature suggests. His later work (after 1990) is largely unnoticed by academics, nevertheless, it is the empirical findings of his theoretical postulations. Moreover, his work interfaces with virtually all schools of thought in strategic management.
Research limitations/implications – It will provide a broader view of Ansoff's work and perhaps trigger additional research as a result of his later work. Most researchers continue to associate Ansoff with his early thoughts.
Practical implications – Ansoff's work has found wide applications in a variety of industries. His work was mostly with industries that used his propositions in order to better strategies.
Social implications – Ansoff's later research and empirical findings could provide a launchpad for re-examining the method by which organizations assess their environment, strategic behaviour, and internal capability. Therefore, organizations may have an alternative method to develop strategy.
Originality/value – This is the first attempt to provide a historical view of Ansoff's work and perhaps his timeliness. The recent economic crisis only further supports Ansoff's basic position that companies must create custom strategies to fit their environment, culture, and capabilities.
Existing customers: login
to access this document
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian