Search
  Advanced Search
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management

Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management

ISSN: 1471-4175

Online from: 2001

Subject Area: Built Environment

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Labour productivity model for reinforced concrete construction projects


Document Information:
Title:Labour productivity model for reinforced concrete construction projects
Author(s):Homyun Jang, (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea), Kyonghoon Kim, (Department of Sustainable Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea), Juhyung Kim, (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea), Jaejun Kim, (Department of Sustainable Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea)
Citation:Homyun Jang, Kyonghoon Kim, Juhyung Kim, Jaejun Kim, (2011) "Labour productivity model for reinforced concrete construction projects", Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, Vol. 11 Iss: 1, pp.92 - 113
Keywords:Analytical hierarchy process, Labour, Productivity rate, Regression analysis
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/14714171111104655 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

Purpose – This study aims to identify systematically the factors that can often influence labour productivity directly and indirectly, to build a model that can evaluate the significance of these factors. The model can be used as a tool for assisting field construction mangers responsible for productivity.

Design/methodology/approach – The factors were first identified by undertaking a literature review. The scope and method for measuring labour productivity were then determined. The final analysis model was built through a statistical analysis conducted with the chosen factors.

Findings – The results of the analysis indicate that the work management component (e.g. the manager's abilities) and the work technique component (e.g. work continuity) have greater impact than the worker component (e.g. the workers' capability) and the work characteristic component (e.g. work difficulty).

Research limitations/implications – This research focuses on the qualitative perspective of site managers on labour productivity. Although the process of translating qualitative opinions into quantitative data is a matter for debate, the result of this research, when compared to other quantitative studies, can be used to establish a strategy and an action plan for managing labour productivity.

Practical implications – Qualitative aspects that were considered to establish a labour productivity model can be evaluated by site construction managers. Despite the importance of these qualitative aspects, they have, by and large, been neglected, as models to date tend to consider more directly measurable quantitative factors. In particular, they can be used to develop a strategy for increasing labour productivity at the initial planning stage.

Originality/value – This research explores the differences between a subjective perception and the objective reality of labour productivity.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?
- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (213kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list


Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions