Online from: 1974
Subject Area: Economics
|Title:||A “human ecology economics” framework for Eastern Europe|
|Author(s):||Roy Allen, (Saint Mary's College of California, Moraga, California, USA), Norman Bedford, (Saint Mary's College of California, Moraga, California, USA), András Margitay-Becht, (Saint Mary's College of California, Moraga, California, USA)|
|Citation:||Roy Allen, Norman Bedford, András Margitay-Becht, (2011) "A “human ecology economics” framework for Eastern Europe", International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 38 Iss: 3, pp.192 - 208|
|Keywords:||Azerbaijan, Ecology, Economic growth, Estonia, Hungary, Sustainable development|
|Article type:||Conceptual paper|
|DOI:||10.1108/03068291111105147 (Permanent URL)|
|Publisher:||Emerald Group Publishing Limited|
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present a “human ecology economics (HEE)” framework for understanding economic growth and development challenges in Eastern Europe.
Design/methodology/approach – The HEE approach relies on evolutionary and complex systems processes; it expands the field of ecological economics by incorporating interdisciplinary material from the humanities; and it allows a long-run perspective with a focus on sustainability of human systems. Using this framework and primary research from Hungary, Estonia, and Azerbaijan, challenges to Eastern European development are identified.
Findings – The main limit to Eastern European sustainable development is not “production capital”, i.e. the availability of natural resources, fixed human-made capital, and intermediate consumption, but instead shortages of “transaction capital”, i.e. “social capital, informational capital, and financial capital.”
Research limitations/implications – Rigorous analytical models of, and precise predictions of, change in the human ecology are at present not possible using evolutionary and complex systems approaches; however, Eastern Europe can be fruitfully studied through the HEE approach, and certain simulation methods and lessons from recent history are suggested.
Practical implications – Greater support for various kinds of transaction capital is recommended, including for social and communication networks, for information exchange between small and medium size businesses, for innovation and creative learning by doing, for financial intermediation, for better inter-party cooperation at the national level, etc.
Social implications – The need for greater social cooperation, including a reduction in discrimination exercised by dominant individuals or groups, arises as a more important pre-condition for sustainable economic growth than is commonly believed.
Originality/value – Scholars, policymakers, and practitioners might appreciate the more comprehensive interdisciplinary framework for understanding economic growth and development challenges in Eastern Europe, especially the role played by intangible belief systems, social agreements, and levels of cooperation.
Existing customers: login
to access this document
Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (167kb)
Due to our platform migration, pay-per-view is temporarily unavailable.
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian