Search
  Advanced Search
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Online Information Review

Online Information Review

ISSN: 1468-4527

Online from: 1977

Subject Area: Library and Information Studies

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

 

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Analysis of the macro-level discourse structure of literature reviews


Document Information:
Title:Analysis of the macro-level discourse structure of literature reviews
Author(s):Christopher S.G. Khoo, (Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore), Jin-Cheon Na, (Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore), Kokil Jaidka, (Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore)
Citation:Christopher S.G. Khoo, Jin-Cheon Na, Kokil Jaidka, (2011) "Analysis of the macro-level discourse structure of literature reviews", Online Information Review, Vol. 35 Iss: 2, pp.255 - 271
Keywords:Information management, Information science, Literature
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/14684521111128032 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to analyze the macro-level discourse structure of literature reviews found in information science journal papers, and to identify different styles of literature review writing. Although there have been several studies of human abstracting, there are hardly any studies of how authors construct literature reviews.

Design/methodology/approach – This study is carried out in the context of a project to develop a summarization system to generate literature reviews automatically. A coding scheme was developed to annotate the high-level organization of literature reviews, focusing on the types of information. Two sets of annotations were used to check inter-coder reliability.

Findings – It was found that literature reviews are written in two distinctive styles, with different discourse structures. Descriptive literature reviews summarize individual papers/studies and provide more information on each study, such as research methods, results and interpretation. Integrative literature reviews provide fewer details of individual papers/studies, but focus on ideas and results extracted from these papers. They provide critical summaries of topics, and have a more complex structure of topics and sub-topics. The reviewer's voice is also more dominant.

Originality/value – The coding scheme is useful for annotating the macro-level discourse structure of literature reviews, and can be used for studying literature reviews in other fields. The basic characteristics of two styles of literature review writing are identified. The results have provided a foundation for further studies of literature reviews – to identify discourse relations and rhetorical functions employed in literature reviews, and their linguistic expressions.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?
- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (282kb)

Due to our platform migration, pay-per-view is temporarily unavailable.

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list


Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions