Currently published as: Journal of Forensic Practice
Online from: 1999
Subject Area: Health and Social Care
Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile
|Title:||Good Lives sexual offender treatment for mentally disordered offenders|
|Author(s):||Theresa A. Gannon, (University of Kent, Canterbury, UK and Kent Forensic Psychiatry Services, Maidstone, UK), Tracy King, (Kent Forensic Psychiatry Services, Maidstone, UK and University of Kent, Canterbury, UK), Helen Miles, (Kent Forensic Psychiatry Services, Maidstone, UK and University of Kent, Canterbury, UK), Lona Lockerbie, (Kent Forensic Psychiatry Services, Maidstone, UK and University of Kent, Canterbury, UK), Gwenda M. Willis, (Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand)|
|Citation:||Theresa A. Gannon, Tracy King, Helen Miles, Lona Lockerbie, Gwenda M. Willis, (2011) "Good Lives sexual offender treatment for mentally disordered offenders", The British Journal of Forensic Practice, Vol. 13 Iss: 3, pp.153 - 168|
|Keywords:||Good Lives model, Medical treatment, Patients, Rehabilitation, Sexual offenders|
|Article type:||Case study|
|DOI:||10.1108/14636641111157805 (Permanent URL)|
|Publisher:||Emerald Group Publishing Limited|
Purpose – The main aim of this paper is to describe the content, structure and preliminary evaluation of a new Good Lives sexual offender treatment group (SOTG) for male mentally disordered offenders.
Design/methodology/approach – As evaluation and work on the SOTG is necessarily ongoing, case study descriptions of each patient who attended the SOTG and of their progress throughout SOTG are described.
Findings – Overall, the case study progress reports suggest that mentally disordered male patients made some notable progress on SOTG despite their differential and complex needs. In particular, attention to each patient's life goals and motivators appeared to play a key role in promoting treatment engagement. Furthermore, patients with lower intelligence quotient and/or indirect pathways required additional support to understand the links between the Good Lives Model (GLM) and their own risk for sexual offending.
Research limitations/implications – Further evaluations of SOTG groups, that incorporate higher numbers of participants and adequate control groups, are required before solid conclusions and generalisations can be made.
Practical implications – Practitioners should consider providing additional support to clients when implementing any future SOTGs for mentally disordered patients.
Originality/value – This is the first paper to outline and describe implementation of the GLM in the sexual offender treatment of mentally disordered male patients group format. As such, it will be of interest to any professionals involved in the facilitation of sexual offender treatment within this population.
Existing customers: login
to access this document
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian