Online from: 1899
Subject Area: Industry and Public Sector Management
Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile
|Title:||Predicting breakfast consumption: A comparison of the theory of planned behaviour and the health action process approach|
|Author(s):||Barbara Mullan, (School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia), Cara Wong, (School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia), Emily Kothe, (School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia), Carolyn Maccann, (School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia)|
|Citation:||Barbara Mullan, Cara Wong, Emily Kothe, Carolyn Maccann, (2013) "Predicting breakfast consumption: A comparison of the theory of planned behaviour and the health action process approach", British Food Journal, Vol. 115 Iss: 11, pp.1638 - 1657|
|Keywords:||Breakfast consumption, Health action process approach, Self efficacy|
|Article type:||Research paper|
|DOI:||10.1108/BFJ-05-2011-0127 (Permanent URL)|
|Publisher:||Emerald Group Publishing Limited|
|Acknowledgements:||The authors would like to thank Kathleen O'Moore for her assistance with creating the online questionnaires. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.|
Purpose – Breakfast consumption is associated with a range of beneficial health outcomes including improved overall diet quality, lower BMI, decreased risk of chronic disease, and improved cognitive function. Although there are many models of health and social behaviour, there is a paucity of research utilising these in breakfast consumption and very few studies that directly compare these models. This study aims to compare the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and the health action process approach (HAPA) in predicting breakfast consumption.
Design/methodology/approach – University students (
Findings – Using structural equation modelling, it was found that the TPB model was a superior fit to the data across a range of model indices compared to the HAPA. Both models significantly predicted both intentions and behaviour at follow up; however, the TPB predicted a higher proportion of the variance in breakfast consumption (47.6 per cent) than the HAPA (44.8 per cent). Further, the volitional variables did not mediate the intention-behaviour gap, and the data were not an adequate statistical fit to the model compared to the TPB.
Research limitations/implications – The results support the use of the TPB and show that some aspects of the HAPA are useful in predicting breakfast consumption, suggesting that risk perception and self-efficacy be targeted in interventions to increase behaviour. The volitional variables did not appear to mediate breakfast consumption indicating that intention is still the strongest predictor, at least in this behaviour.
Originality/value – The current study is the first to compare the TPB and HAPA in predicting breakfast consumption.
Existing customers: login
to access this document
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian