Incorporates: Journal of Management History (Archive)
Online from: 1967
Subject Area: Accounting and Finance
Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile
|Title:||Knowledge boundary spanning process: synthesizing four spanning mechanisms|
|Author(s):||Matthew A. Hawkins, (Department of Marketing Management, ESADE Business School, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain), Mohammad H. Rezazade M., (Institute for Innovation and Knowledge Management (IIK), ESADE Business School, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain)|
|Citation:||Matthew A. Hawkins, Mohammad H. Rezazade M., (2012) "Knowledge boundary spanning process: synthesizing four spanning mechanisms", Management Decision, Vol. 50 Iss: 10, pp.1800 - 1815|
|Keywords:||Boundary discourse, Boundary object, Boundary practice, Boundary spanner, Boundary spanning, Innovation, Knowledge boundary, Knowledge management|
|Article type:||Conceptual paper|
|DOI:||10.1108/00251741211279611 (Permanent URL)|
|Publisher:||Emerald Group Publishing Limited|
|Acknowledgements:||The authors would like to thank Joan Rodón and Heidi Tscherning from ESADE and the participants at The Second Conference of the International Network of Business and Management Journals for their valuable feedback. Additionally, a portion of this paper was prepared while the lead author was a Visiting Scholar at the University of California-Irvine. Accordingly, he would like to thank Professor Alladi Venkatesh for his support during this time.|
Purpose – This paper seeks to advance the study of knowledge boundary spanning by approaching spanning as a process that involves four spanning mechanisms.
Design/methodology/approach – Building on the insights from practice-based view of knowledge and knowledge management literature more generally, the authors formalize and articulate two spanning mechanisms (boundary practice and boundary discourse), in addition to two other previously established spanning mechanisms (boundary object and boundary spanner).
Findings – The paper formalizes two further spanning mechanisms and suggests an integrative framework for examining the mutual and compounding effect between the four spanning mechanisms. Building on the suggested framework, the process of spanning is analysed as a time-based combination of various mechanisms which evolve over time. The framework opens new windows to look at the projective and emergent mode of spanning mechanisms as a duality, rather than a dualism.
Research limitations/implications – Researchers are freed to explore the deployment order of the spanning mechanisms and the conflicting or synergistic effects. Practitioners would benefit from tracing successful spanning processes for replicating in similar contexts to advance collaboration efforts.
Originality/value – Boundary practice and boundary discourse are introduced as well as synthesizing the mechanisms into a coherent framework. Viewing boundary spanning as a process that includes dynamic combination of four spanning mechanisms is a particularly novel insight that can stimulate future research avenues.
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian