Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest

Search for:


Browse:

Bannner: Aslib individual membership.
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Personnel Review

Personnel Review

ISSN: 0048-3486

Online from: 1971

Subject Area: Human Resource Management

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Explaining engagement in personal activities on company time


Document Information:
Title:Explaining engagement in personal activities on company time
Author(s):Erik R. Eddy, (Department of Marketing and Management, Siena College, Loudonville, New York, USA), Caroline P. D'Abate, (Department of Management and Business, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, New York, USA), Paul W. Thurston Jr, (Department of Marketing and Management, Siena College, Loudonville, New York, USA)
Citation:Erik R. Eddy, Caroline P. D'Abate, Paul W. Thurston Jr, (2010) "Explaining engagement in personal activities on company time", Personnel Review, Vol. 39 Iss: 5, pp.639 - 654
Keywords:Boredom, Employee involvement, Employee relations
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/00483481011064181 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore rationalizations individuals provide for engaging in personal activities on company time.

Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from 121 survey respondents working in a variety of organizations and backgrounds. Respondents provided information on the number of times they engage in various personal activities while at work, the amount of time engaged in these activities, and their rationalizations for performing personal activities during work hours.

Findings – Results suggest that employees spend nearly five hours in a typical workweek engaged in personal activities. More than 90 per cent of this time is spent using the internet, email, phone, or conversing with co-workers. Employees use a variety of rationalizations for such behavior, but only two rationalizations (i.e. boredom and convenience) were statistically reliable predictors of the extent to which they engaged in personal activities on company time.

Practical implications – The current research finds that boredom and convenience are related to the extent that employees engage in personal activities on company time. Improvements in the work environment to reduce boredom might show a marked decrease in these behaviors, thereby mitigating the need for organizations to develop formal policies against these behaviors.

Originality/value – This is only the second quantitative study to examine the amount of time individuals spend engaged in specific personal activities on the job. It is the first quantitative exploration of the rationalizations employees use to justify these behaviors.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (106kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright information  |  Site policies  |  Cookie information
..