Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest

Search for:


Browse:

Bannner: Aslib individual membership.
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Journal of Economic Studies

Journal of Economic Studies

ISSN: 0144-3585

Online from: 1974

Subject Area: Economics

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

China's exchange rate policy and the United States' trade deficits


Document Information:
Title:China's exchange rate policy and the United States' trade deficits
Author(s):Abdol S. Soofi, (Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin-Platteville, Platteville, Wisconsin, USA)
Citation:Abdol S. Soofi, (2009) "China's exchange rate policy and the United States' trade deficits", Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 36 Iss: 1, pp.36 - 65
Keywords:China, Exchange rates, Government policy, International trade, United States of America
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/01443580910923795 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Acknowledgements:JEL classifications – F14, F31, F42
Abstract:

Purpose – This paper aims to critically examine China's exchange rate policy debate and discuss Chinese financial and capital control reform of recent years. Furthermore, using the empirical results based on a regional general equilibrium model, alternative methods are suggested of addressing American concerns about China's role in contributing towards global financial stability and American trade deficits with China.

Design/methodology/approach – Regional general equilibrium input-output model.

Findings – Sino-American debate on exchange rate policy is a matter of difference of opinion in sequencing of policies China has adopted to reduce capital account control and make her exchange rate regime more flexible. Using the final demand elasticity of exports it is observed that Chinese expansionary fiscal stimuli do have powerful effects in inducing additional exports for the United States and other Chinese trading partners.

Research limitations/implications – The model does not include rest-of-the-world economies.

Practical implications: – The results imply viable alternatives to renminbi/dollar appreciation policy in dealing with US-China persistent trade deficit.

Originality/value – The paper suggests a new, empirical-based policy recommendation in dealing with the US trade deficit with China.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (115kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright information  |  Site policies  |  Cookie information
.