Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest

Search for:


Browse:

Bannner: Aslib individual membership.
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Journal of Management Development

Journal of Management Development

ISSN: 0262-1711

Online from: 1982

Subject Area: Human Resource Management

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Using new social media and Web 2.0 technologies in business school teaching and learning


Document Information:
Title:Using new social media and Web 2.0 technologies in business school teaching and learning
Author(s):Michael Thomas, (BlueEyed Digital Marketing Limited, Stratford-upon-Avon, UK), Howard Thomas, (Lee Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore Management University, Singapore)
Citation:Michael Thomas, Howard Thomas, (2012) "Using new social media and Web 2.0 technologies in business school teaching and learning", Journal of Management Development, Vol. 31 Iss: 4, pp.358 - 367
Keywords:Blended and distance learning, Business schools, Learning communities, Learning methods, Social and digital media, Teaching, Technology enhanced teaching models, Web 2.0
Article type:Conceptual paper
DOI:10.1108/02621711211219013 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of social and digital media in the business school and particularly to examine how such innovative technological processes can be leveraged to enhance teaching instruction and enrich learning about practice and research.

Design/methodology/approach – Taking a broad perspective on the range of social and digital media approaches, the paper discusses a series of extant models of technology-based learning and conjectures about how they can be used creatively and meaningfully in business school teaching.

Findings – Despite the pioneering efforts of the Open University in modelling distance and blended learning, adoption of such models in the business school context has been quite slow. These technologies are used more frequently as support mechanisms for “face-to-face” learning in order to enrich the quality of conventional professorial instructional approaches. In many business schools “face-to-face” learning is perceived to be of much higher quality than on-line learning approaches.

Originality/value – The paper notes the resistance to the adoption of new technology both by business school professors and deans. In the case of professors, there is inertia to change and a staunch defence of classic forms of “face-to-face” instruction. In the case of deans, few have sufficient courage or time (given the short average tenure of deans) to invest in and implement new technology strategies for teaching and learning. However, business school deans can no longer ignore the potentially disruptive innovations that will occur in teaching and learning processes.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (72kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright information  |  Site policies  |  Cookie information
..