ISSN: 0262-1711
Online from: 1982
Subject Area: Human Resource Management
Content: Latest Issue |
Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues
Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile
This is one of our current Journals Of The Week - all articles are available free, except for Backfiles content!
| Title: | Coaching executive teams to reach better decisions |
|---|---|
| Author(s): | Shlomo Ben-Hur, (IMD, Lausanne, Switzerland), Nikolas Kinley, (Barclays Global Retail Bank, London, UK), Karsten Jonsen, (IMD, Lausanne, Switzerland) |
| Citation: | Shlomo Ben-Hur, Nikolas Kinley, Karsten Jonsen, (2012) "Coaching executive teams to reach better decisions", Journal of Management Development, Vol. 31 Iss: 7, pp.711 - 723 |
| Keywords: | Autonomous work groups, Coaching, Decision making, Leadership development, Team performance, Teams |
| Article type: | Conceptual paper |
| DOI: | 10.1108/02621711211243908 (Permanent URL) |
| Publisher: | Emerald Group Publishing Limited |
| Abstract: | Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present a systemic approach to understanding the challenges facing executive teams in making good decisions and propose a simple framework for addressing these challenges. Design/methodology/approach – Having identified Groupthink as a useful framework for understanding the challenges facing decision-making groups, the paper reviews research into potential solutions and leverages case studies to propose a new model for tackling the challenges inherent in decision making. Findings – The suggested model incorporates previously proposed process- and insight-based solutions and adds a broader focus on information flow and how decision-making behaviour is influenced and informed by the context in which it occurs. Practical implications – The paper emphasises the role of a trusted, expert coach in implementing the proposed solutions and describes how coaches can leverage an understanding of the systemic nature of decision-making behaviour to improve decision-making ability in both teams and individuals. Research limitations/implications – Areas for future research are identified and potential limitations to the model are discussed, in particular the impact of geographical and organisational cultural issues. Originality/value – The paper questions the predominantly individual-based approach to tackling the challenges of decision making and highlights additional interpersonal processes that can both cause and be the source of solutions to Groupthink. |