Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest

Search for:


Browse:

Bannner: Aslib individual membership.
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Facilities

Facilities

ISSN: 0263-2772

Online from: 1983

Subject Area: Built Environment

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Determinants of the implementation of facility management in German communes


Document Information:
Title:Determinants of the implementation of facility management in German communes
Author(s):Uwe Peter Kanning, (Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Germany), Sabrina Vogler, (Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Germany), Torben Bernhold, (ISFM, Ahlen, Germany), Klaus Gellenbeck, (ISFM, Ahlen, Germany), Bernd Schlockermann, (Facility Care AG, Münster, Germany)
Citation:Uwe Peter Kanning, Sabrina Vogler, Torben Bernhold, Klaus Gellenbeck, Bernd Schlockermann, (2008) "Determinants of the implementation of facility management in German communes", Facilities, Vol. 26 Iss: 9/10, pp.418 - 425
Keywords:Facilities, Germany, Partnership
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/02632770810885760 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

Purpose – This paper sets out to assess the extent of application of two important facets of facility management – building management and the principle of public-private partnership (PPP).

Design/methodology/approach – The approach takes the form of a survey of German communes, the primary interest in this regard being the question of the determinants of this application. The theory of planned behaviour forms the theoretical basis of the investigation. A total of 282 mayors, 217 treasurers and 168 heads of real estate offices ultimately participated in the survey.

Findings – Professional building management, understood to be a package of facility management services during the building use phase, and in particular PPP, have so far only been realised in German communes to a very limited extent, despite consistently positive attitudes on the part of the decision-makers. The investigation sheds light on the differential reasons: in the case of PPP, normative pressure for co-operation between communes and business proves to be the most influential determinant, while in the case of building management subjectively perceived control is of greatest importance.

Research limitations/implications – The results reflect just processes in communes, but they give an example of the usability of the theory of planned behaviour as the explanation of the FM-implementation process.

Practical implications – The results give ideas for pushing the FM-implementation in communes.

Originality/value – There has been no previous research on this topic.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (129kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright information  |  Site policies  |  Cookie information
..