Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest

Search for:


Browse:

Bannner: Aslib individual membership.
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Marketing Intelligence & Planning

Marketing Intelligence & Planning

ISSN: 0263-4503
Incorporates: Journal of Marketing Practice: Applied Marketing Science

Online from: 1983

Subject Area: Marketing

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

The role of the stakeholder perspective in measuring corporate reputation


Document Information:
Title:The role of the stakeholder perspective in measuring corporate reputation
Author(s):Petya Puncheva-Michelotti, (ESC Rennes School of Business, Rennes, France), Marco Michelotti, (ESC Rennes School of Business, Rennes, France)
Citation:Petya Puncheva-Michelotti, Marco Michelotti, (2010) "The role of the stakeholder perspective in measuring corporate reputation", Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 28 Iss: 3, pp.249 - 274
Keywords:Corporate communications, Corporate image, Decision making, Stakeholder analysis
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/02634501011041417 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Acknowledgements:The authors would like to thank Gaby Ramia, Peter Gahan and Sabrina Helm for their valuable comments on earlier drafts of this paper.
Abstract:

Purpose – The aim of this paper is to develop an effective measure of corporate reputation when stakeholders are faced with different decision situations.

Design/methodology/approach – The study research question was addressed using survey data from 500 respondents involved in four decision situations: purchasing products from a company, seeking employment, purchasing shares and supporting the operations of a company in their community.

Findings – The findings suggest that corporate reputation is a situational construct which is continuously redefined by stakeholders according to the decision they are considering. Thus, companies may not have the same reputation when seeking different kind of support from stakeholders.

Research limitations/implications – In order to generalise the findings, the collection of data by means of surveys of larger random samples from multiple countries are strongly encouraged.

Practical implications – The paper contributes to the development of effective measures of corporate reputation for individuals who may have hybrid stakeholder identity and are involved in diverse decisions regarding companies. This contribution is valuable in that it can be used by managers and companies to establish more effective corporate communication strategies, which directly address the information needs of individuals considering different relationships with firms.

Originality/value – The paper identifies the value placed on various reputation dimensions when individuals consider different relationships with companies. By doing so, we provide an innovative tool that can be utilised by marketing managers to measure the attractiveness of companies to potential consumers, employees, investors and community members.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (126kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright information  |  Site policies  |  Cookie information
.