Online from: 1983
Subject Area: Library and Information Studies
Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile
|Title:||Intradisciplinary differences in reading behaviour of scientists: Case study of physics and astronomy|
|Author(s):||Hamid R. Jamali, (Department of Educational Technology, Tarbiat Moallem University, Tehran, Iran), David Nicholas, (Department of Information Studies, University College London, London, UK)|
|Citation:||Hamid R. Jamali, David Nicholas, (2010) "Intradisciplinary differences in reading behaviour of scientists: Case study of physics and astronomy", Electronic Library, The, Vol. 28 Iss: 1, pp.54 - 68|
|Keywords:||Astronomy, Electronic journals, Physics, Preprints, Reading, Sciences|
|Article type:||Research paper|
|DOI:||10.1108/02640471011023379 (Permanent URL)|
|Publisher:||Emerald Group Publishing Limited|
|Acknowledgements:||The authors would like to thank the Iranian Ministry of Science, Research and Technology for funding the study.|
Purpose – This paper seeks to investigate the reading behaviour of scientists from an intradisciplinary perspective.
Design/methodology/approach – Different aspects of reading behaviour were studied including the amount of reading, the sources of reading, and the impact of factors such as age, academic status, academic activities and methods used for identifying articles on reading behaviour. The data were collected through a survey of 114 physicists and astronomers (faculty members and PhD students) at University College London. A total of 56 interviews were also conducted with PhD students and faculty members.
Findings – The results revealed intradisciplinary differences within physics and astronomy in terms of reading behaviour. The study showed that recently published articles account for a large proportion of the readings. Age and academic status have an influence on the age of papers read. The amount of reading is influenced by the type of activities academics conduct, meaning those who spend more time teaching read fewer papers and those who spend more time doing research read more papers.
Originality/value – The paper is the first to look at intradisciplinary differences within a single discipline and reveals the impact of some task-related and information-seeking factors on reading behaviour.
Existing customers: login
to access this document
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian