Advanced Search
Journal search
Journal cover: Electronic Library, The

Electronic Library, The

ISSN: 0264-0473

Online from: 1983

Subject Area: Library and Information Studies

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues


Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Intradisciplinary differences in reading behaviour of scientists: Case study of physics and astronomy

Document Information:
Title:Intradisciplinary differences in reading behaviour of scientists: Case study of physics and astronomy
Author(s):Hamid R. Jamali, (Department of Educational Technology, Tarbiat Moallem University, Tehran, Iran), David Nicholas, (Department of Information Studies, University College London, London, UK)
Citation:Hamid R. Jamali, David Nicholas, (2010) "Intradisciplinary differences in reading behaviour of scientists: Case study of physics and astronomy", Electronic Library, The, Vol. 28 Iss: 1, pp.54 - 68
Keywords:Astronomy, Electronic journals, Physics, Preprints, Reading, Sciences
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/02640471011023379 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Acknowledgements:The authors would like to thank the Iranian Ministry of Science, Research and Technology for funding the study.

Purpose – This paper seeks to investigate the reading behaviour of scientists from an intradisciplinary perspective.

Design/methodology/approach – Different aspects of reading behaviour were studied including the amount of reading, the sources of reading, and the impact of factors such as age, academic status, academic activities and methods used for identifying articles on reading behaviour. The data were collected through a survey of 114 physicists and astronomers (faculty members and PhD students) at University College London. A total of 56 interviews were also conducted with PhD students and faculty members.

Findings – The results revealed intradisciplinary differences within physics and astronomy in terms of reading behaviour. The study showed that recently published articles account for a large proportion of the readings. Age and academic status have an influence on the age of papers read. The amount of reading is influenced by the type of activities academics conduct, meaning those who spend more time teaching read fewer papers and those who spend more time doing research read more papers.

Originality/value – The paper is the first to look at intradisciplinary differences within a single discipline and reveals the impact of some task-related and information-seeking factors on reading behaviour.

Fulltext Options:



Existing customers: login
to access this document


- Forgot password?
- Athens/Institutional login



Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (335kb)

Due to our platform migration, pay-per-view is temporarily unavailable.

To purchase this item please login or register.


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian

Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions