Search
  Advanced Search
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Managerial Auditing Journal

Managerial Auditing Journal

ISSN: 0268-6902

Online from: 1986

Subject Area: Accounting and Finance

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

The internal audit function: Perceptions of internal audit roles, effectiveness and evaluation


Document Information:
Title:The internal audit function: Perceptions of internal audit roles, effectiveness and evaluation
Author(s):Dominic S.B. Soh, (Department of Accounting and Corporate Governance, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia), Nonna Martinov-Bennie, (Department of Accounting and Corporate Governance, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia)
Citation:Dominic S.B. Soh, Nonna Martinov-Bennie, (2011) "The internal audit function: Perceptions of internal audit roles, effectiveness and evaluation", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 26 Iss: 7, pp.605 - 622
Keywords:Audit committee, Australia, Corporate governance, Internal audit, Performance evaluation
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/02686901111151332 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide insights into the current roles and responsibilities of the internal audit (IA) function and the factors perceived to be necessary to ensure its effectiveness. The current performance evaluation practices of IA are also examined.

Design/methodology/approach – Semi-structured interviews were utilised to elicit the perceptions of key corporate governance actors about the evolving role of IA, as well as IA effectiveness, in terms of its design, measurement and evaluation.

Findings – The results of the study suggest significant expansion and refocus of the role of IA and perceptions of its effectiveness. However, the findings also suggest that performance evaluation mechanisms of IA have not evolved contemporaneously. The misalignment between the role and evaluation gives rise to difficulty in assessing the extent to which IA functions are meeting stakeholders' expectations.

Practical implications – The findings are useful in informing the deliberations of regulators and standard setters, as well as providing a benchmark for internal auditors and audit committees. The insights are also relevant for external auditors who are required to consider various aspects of corporate governance, including the objectivity and quality of IA.

Originality/value – The use of semi-structured interviews facilitates an in-depth insight and understanding of the perceptions of roles, effectiveness and evaluation of IA and adds depth to the predominantly questionnaire-based survey approach of prior studies.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?
- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (108kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list


Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions