Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest

Search for:


Browse:

Bannner: Aslib individual membership.
 
Journal search
Journal cover: European Journal of Marketing

European Journal of Marketing

ISSN: 0309-0566

Online from: 1967

Subject Area: Marketing

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Icon: .Table of Contents.Icon: .

The relative performance of TV sponsorship versus television spot advertising


Document Information:
Title:The relative performance of TV sponsorship versus television spot advertising
Author(s):Erik L. Olson, (Marketing Institute, Norwegian School of Management, Oslo, Norway), Hans Mathias Thjømøe, (Marketing Institute, Norwegian School of Management, Oslo, Norway)
Citation:Erik L. Olson, Hans Mathias Thjømøe, (2012) "The relative performance of TV sponsorship versus television spot advertising", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 46 Iss: 11/12, pp.1726 - 1742
Keywords:Communication effects, Consumer behaviour, Financial implications, Sponsorship, Spot advertising, Television commercials, TV sponsoring
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/03090561211260068 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Acknowledgements:The authors wish to thank Vegard Arntsen of Sponsor Insight AS, Oslo, Norway, for help in the data collection and editorial comments.
Abstract:

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to compare the relative performance of TV sponsorships with the industry standard 30-second TV spot advertising on achieving common communication goals.

Design/methodology/approach – The two media are tested with an experiment using realistic stimuli and target market representative samples and employing six brands as both TV sponsors and TV advertisers.

Findings – Ten seconds of TV sponsoring works almost equally as well as 30-second spots across all measures and brands. While the outright performance differs by type of brand (i.e. high fit versus lower fit, known versus unknown), the relative performance between media does not vary.

Research limitations/implications – The stimuli only gave subjects a brief exposure to each medium. The six stimuli brands, four effect measures, and the Norwegian sample may also not be representative for all types of TV sponsoring/advertising contexts.

Practical implications – Marketing managers can use the results to better allocate their communication spending between TV spot advertising and TV sponsorships, by determining which medium offers better value in achieving communication goals.

Originality/value – To the authors' knowledge, the comparison is the most realistic and controlled experiment in this area, with high levels of internal and external validity.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (103kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright information  |  Site policies  |  Cookie information
.